Git with a cup of tea, painless self-hosted git service Mirror for internal git.with.parts use https://git.with.parts
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
gitea/tests/integration/api_repo_test.go

740 lines
28 KiB

// Copyright 2017 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package integration
import (
"fmt"
"net/http"
"net/url"
"testing"
auth_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/auth"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
access_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/perm/access"
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
unit_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unit"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
api "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
repo_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/repository"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/tests"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
)
func TestAPIUserReposNotLogin(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
req := NewRequestf(t, "GET", "/api/v1/users/%s/repos", user.Name)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
var apiRepos []api.Repository
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &apiRepos)
expectedLen := unittest.GetCount(t, repo_model.Repository{OwnerID: user.ID},
unittest.Cond("is_private = ?", false))
assert.Len(t, apiRepos, expectedLen)
for _, repo := range apiRepos {
assert.EqualValues(t, user.ID, repo.Owner.ID)
assert.False(t, repo.Private)
}
}
func TestAPIUserReposWithWrongToken(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
wrongToken := fmt.Sprintf("Bearer %s", "wrong_token")
req := NewRequestf(t, "GET", "/api/v1/users/%s/repos", user.Name).
AddTokenAuth(wrongToken)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusUnauthorized)
assert.Contains(t, resp.Body.String(), "user does not exist")
}
func TestAPISearchRepo(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
const keyword = "test"
req := NewRequestf(t, "GET", "/api/v1/repos/search?q=%s", keyword)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
var body api.SearchResults
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &body)
assert.NotEmpty(t, body.Data)
for _, repo := range body.Data {
assert.Contains(t, repo.Name, keyword)
assert.False(t, repo.Private)
}
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 15})
user2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 16})
org3 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 18})
user4 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 20})
orgUser := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 17})
oldAPIDefaultNum := setting.API.DefaultPagingNum
defer func() {
setting.API.DefaultPagingNum = oldAPIDefaultNum
}()
setting.API.DefaultPagingNum = 10
// Map of expected results, where key is user for login
type expectedResults map[*user_model.User]struct {
count int
repoOwnerID int64
repoName string
includesPrivate bool
}
testCases := []struct {
name, requestURL string
expectedResults
}{
{
name: "RepositoriesMax50", requestURL: "/api/v1/repos/search?limit=50&private=false", expectedResults: expectedResults{
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com>
1 month ago
nil: {count: 36},
user: {count: 36},
user2: {count: 36},
},
},
{
name: "RepositoriesMax10", requestURL: "/api/v1/repos/search?limit=10&private=false", expectedResults: expectedResults{
nil: {count: 10},
user: {count: 10},
user2: {count: 10},
},
},
{
name: "RepositoriesDefault", requestURL: "/api/v1/repos/search?default&private=false", expectedResults: expectedResults{
nil: {count: 10},
user: {count: 10},
user2: {count: 10},
},
},
{
name: "RepositoriesByName", requestURL: fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/search?q=%s&private=false", "big_test_"), expectedResults: expectedResults{
nil: {count: 7, repoName: "big_test_"},
user: {count: 7, repoName: "big_test_"},
user2: {count: 7, repoName: "big_test_"},
},
},
{
name: "RepositoriesByName", requestURL: fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/search?q=%s&private=false", "user2/big_test_"), expectedResults: expectedResults{
user2: {count: 2, repoName: "big_test_"},
},
},
{
name: "RepositoriesAccessibleAndRelatedToUser", requestURL: fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/search?uid=%d", user.ID), expectedResults: expectedResults{
nil: {count: 5},
user: {count: 9, includesPrivate: true},
user2: {count: 6, includesPrivate: true},
},
},
{
name: "RepositoriesAccessibleAndRelatedToUser2", requestURL: fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/search?uid=%d", user2.ID), expectedResults: expectedResults{
nil: {count: 1},
user: {count: 2, includesPrivate: true},
user2: {count: 2, includesPrivate: true},
user4: {count: 1},
},
},
{
name: "RepositoriesAccessibleAndRelatedToUser3", requestURL: fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/search?uid=%d", org3.ID), expectedResults: expectedResults{
nil: {count: 1},
user: {count: 4, includesPrivate: true},
user2: {count: 3, includesPrivate: true},
org3: {count: 4, includesPrivate: true},
},
},
{
name: "RepositoriesOwnedByOrganization", requestURL: fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/search?uid=%d", orgUser.ID), expectedResults: expectedResults{
nil: {count: 1, repoOwnerID: orgUser.ID},
user: {count: 2, repoOwnerID: orgUser.ID, includesPrivate: true},
user2: {count: 1, repoOwnerID: orgUser.ID},
},
},
{name: "RepositoriesAccessibleAndRelatedToUser4", requestURL: fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/search?uid=%d", user4.ID), expectedResults: expectedResults{
nil: {count: 3},
user: {count: 4, includesPrivate: true},
user4: {count: 7, includesPrivate: true},
}},
{name: "RepositoriesAccessibleAndRelatedToUser4/SearchModeSource", requestURL: fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/search?uid=%d&mode=%s", user4.ID, "source"), expectedResults: expectedResults{
nil: {count: 0},
user: {count: 1, includesPrivate: true},
user4: {count: 1, includesPrivate: true},
}},
{name: "RepositoriesAccessibleAndRelatedToUser4/SearchModeFork", requestURL: fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/search?uid=%d&mode=%s", user4.ID, "fork"), expectedResults: expectedResults{
nil: {count: 1},
user: {count: 1},
user4: {count: 2, includesPrivate: true},
}},
{name: "RepositoriesAccessibleAndRelatedToUser4/SearchModeFork/Exclusive", requestURL: fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/search?uid=%d&mode=%s&exclusive=1", user4.ID, "fork"), expectedResults: expectedResults{
nil: {count: 1},
user: {count: 1},
user4: {count: 2, includesPrivate: true},
}},
{name: "RepositoriesAccessibleAndRelatedToUser4/SearchModeMirror", requestURL: fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/search?uid=%d&mode=%s", user4.ID, "mirror"), expectedResults: expectedResults{
nil: {count: 2},
user: {count: 2},
user4: {count: 4, includesPrivate: true},
}},
{name: "RepositoriesAccessibleAndRelatedToUser4/SearchModeMirror/Exclusive", requestURL: fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/search?uid=%d&mode=%s&exclusive=1", user4.ID, "mirror"), expectedResults: expectedResults{
nil: {count: 1},
user: {count: 1},
user4: {count: 2, includesPrivate: true},
}},
{name: "RepositoriesAccessibleAndRelatedToUser4/SearchModeCollaborative", requestURL: fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/search?uid=%d&mode=%s", user4.ID, "collaborative"), expectedResults: expectedResults{
nil: {count: 0},
user: {count: 1, includesPrivate: true},
user4: {count: 1, includesPrivate: true},
}},
}
for _, testCase := range testCases {
t.Run(testCase.name, func(t *testing.T) {
for userToLogin, expected := range testCase.expectedResults {
var testName string
var userID int64
var token string
if userToLogin != nil && userToLogin.ID > 0 {
testName = fmt.Sprintf("LoggedUser%d", userToLogin.ID)
session := loginUser(t, userToLogin.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
token = getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeReadRepository)
userID = userToLogin.ID
} else {
testName = "AnonymousUser"
_ = emptyTestSession(t)
}
t.Run(testName, func(t *testing.T) {
request := NewRequest(t, "GET", testCase.requestURL).
AddTokenAuth(token)
response := MakeRequest(t, request, http.StatusOK)
var body api.SearchResults
DecodeJSON(t, response, &body)
repoNames := make([]string, 0, len(body.Data))
for _, repo := range body.Data {
repoNames = append(repoNames, fmt.Sprintf("%d:%s:%t", repo.ID, repo.FullName, repo.Private))
}
assert.Len(t, repoNames, expected.count)
for _, repo := range body.Data {
r := getRepo(t, repo.ID)
hasAccess, err := access_model.HasAnyUnitAccess(db.DefaultContext, userID, r)
assert.NoError(t, err, "Error when checking if User: %d has access to %s: %v", userID, repo.FullName, err)
assert.True(t, hasAccess, "User: %d does not have access to %s", userID, repo.FullName)
assert.NotEmpty(t, repo.Name)
assert.Equal(t, repo.Name, r.Name)
if len(expected.repoName) > 0 {
assert.Contains(t, repo.Name, expected.repoName)
}
if expected.repoOwnerID > 0 {
assert.Equal(t, expected.repoOwnerID, repo.Owner.ID)
}
if !expected.includesPrivate {
assert.False(t, repo.Private, "User: %d not expecting private repository: %s", userID, repo.FullName)
}
}
})
}
})
}
}
var repoCache = make(map[int64]*repo_model.Repository)
func getRepo(t *testing.T, repoID int64) *repo_model.Repository {
if _, ok := repoCache[repoID]; !ok {
repoCache[repoID] = unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: repoID})
}
return repoCache[repoID]
}
func TestAPIViewRepo(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
var repo api.Repository
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/api/v1/repos/user2/repo1")
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &repo)
assert.EqualValues(t, 1, repo.ID)
assert.EqualValues(t, "repo1", repo.Name)
assert.EqualValues(t, 2, repo.Releases)
assert.EqualValues(t, 1, repo.OpenIssues)
assert.EqualValues(t, 3, repo.OpenPulls)
req = NewRequest(t, "GET", "/api/v1/repos/user12/repo10")
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &repo)
assert.EqualValues(t, 10, repo.ID)
assert.EqualValues(t, "repo10", repo.Name)
assert.EqualValues(t, 1, repo.OpenPulls)
assert.EqualValues(t, 1, repo.Forks)
req = NewRequest(t, "GET", "/api/v1/repos/user5/repo4")
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &repo)
assert.EqualValues(t, 4, repo.ID)
assert.EqualValues(t, "repo4", repo.Name)
assert.EqualValues(t, 1, repo.Stars)
}
func TestAPIOrgRepos(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
user2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 1})
org3 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 5})
// org3 is an Org. Check their repos.
sourceOrg := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 3})
expectedResults := map[*user_model.User]struct {
count int
includesPrivate bool
}{
user: {count: 1},
user: {count: 3, includesPrivate: true},
user2: {count: 3, includesPrivate: true},
org3: {count: 1},
}
for userToLogin, expected := range expectedResults {
testName := fmt.Sprintf("LoggedUser%d", userToLogin.ID)
session := loginUser(t, userToLogin.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeReadOrganization)
t.Run(testName, func(t *testing.T) {
req := NewRequestf(t, "GET", "/api/v1/orgs/%s/repos", sourceOrg.Name).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
var apiRepos []*api.Repository
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &apiRepos)
assert.Len(t, apiRepos, expected.count)
for _, repo := range apiRepos {
if !expected.includesPrivate {
assert.False(t, repo.Private)
}
}
})
}
}
// See issue #28483. Tests to make sure we consider more than just code unit-enabled repositories.
func TestAPIOrgReposWithCodeUnitDisabled(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
repo21 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{Name: "repo21"})
org3 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: repo21.OwnerID})
// Disable code repository unit.
var units []unit_model.Type
units = append(units, unit_model.TypeCode)
if err := repo_service.UpdateRepositoryUnits(db.DefaultContext, repo21, nil, units); err != nil {
assert.Fail(t, "should have been able to delete code repository unit; failed to %v", err)
}
assert.False(t, repo21.UnitEnabled(db.DefaultContext, unit_model.TypeCode))
session := loginUser(t, "user2")
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeReadOrganization)
req := NewRequestf(t, "GET", "/api/v1/orgs/%s/repos", org3.Name).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
var apiRepos []*api.Repository
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &apiRepos)
var repoNames []string
for _, r := range apiRepos {
repoNames = append(repoNames, r.Name)
}
assert.Contains(t, repoNames, repo21.Name)
}
func TestAPIGetRepoByIDUnauthorized(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 4})
session := loginUser(t, user.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeReadRepository)
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/api/v1/repositories/2").
AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNotFound)
}
func TestAPIRepoMigrate(t *testing.T) {
testCases := []struct {
ctxUserID, userID int64
cloneURL, repoName string
expectedStatus int
}{
{ctxUserID: 1, userID: 2, cloneURL: "https://github.com/go-gitea/test_repo.git", repoName: "git-admin", expectedStatus: http.StatusCreated},
{ctxUserID: 2, userID: 2, cloneURL: "https://github.com/go-gitea/test_repo.git", repoName: "git-own", expectedStatus: http.StatusCreated},
{ctxUserID: 2, userID: 1, cloneURL: "https://github.com/go-gitea/test_repo.git", repoName: "git-bad", expectedStatus: http.StatusForbidden},
{ctxUserID: 2, userID: 3, cloneURL: "https://github.com/go-gitea/test_repo.git", repoName: "git-org", expectedStatus: http.StatusCreated},
{ctxUserID: 2, userID: 6, cloneURL: "https://github.com/go-gitea/test_repo.git", repoName: "git-bad-org", expectedStatus: http.StatusForbidden},
{ctxUserID: 2, userID: 3, cloneURL: "https://localhost:3000/user/test_repo.git", repoName: "private-ip", expectedStatus: http.StatusUnprocessableEntity},
{ctxUserID: 2, userID: 3, cloneURL: "https://10.0.0.1/user/test_repo.git", repoName: "private-ip", expectedStatus: http.StatusUnprocessableEntity},
}
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
for _, testCase := range testCases {
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: testCase.ctxUserID})
session := loginUser(t, user.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", "/api/v1/repos/migrate", &api.MigrateRepoOptions{
CloneAddr: testCase.cloneURL,
RepoOwnerID: testCase.userID,
RepoName: testCase.repoName,
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, NoExpectedStatus)
if resp.Code == http.StatusUnprocessableEntity {
respJSON := map[string]string{}
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &respJSON)
switch respJSON["message"] {
case "Remote visit addressed rate limitation.":
t.Log("test hit github rate limitation")
case "You can not import from disallowed hosts.":
assert.EqualValues(t, "private-ip", testCase.repoName)
default:
assert.FailNow(t, "unexpected error '%v' on url '%s'", respJSON["message"], testCase.cloneURL)
}
} else {
assert.EqualValues(t, testCase.expectedStatus, resp.Code)
}
}
}
func TestAPIRepoMigrateConflict(t *testing.T) {
onGiteaRun(t, testAPIRepoMigrateConflict)
}
func testAPIRepoMigrateConflict(t *testing.T, u *url.URL) {
username := "user2"
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
baseAPITestContext := NewAPITestContext(t, username, "repo1", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
u.Path = baseAPITestContext.GitPath()
t.Run("Existing", func(t *testing.T) {
httpContext := baseAPITestContext
httpContext.Reponame = "repo-tmp-17"
t.Run("CreateRepo", doAPICreateRepository(httpContext, false))
user, err := user_model.GetUserByName(db.DefaultContext, httpContext.Username)
assert.NoError(t, err)
userID := user.ID
cloneURL := "https://github.com/go-gitea/test_repo.git"
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", "/api/v1/repos/migrate",
&api.MigrateRepoOptions{
CloneAddr: cloneURL,
RepoOwnerID: userID,
RepoName: httpContext.Reponame,
}).
AddTokenAuth(httpContext.Token)
resp := httpContext.Session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusConflict)
respJSON := map[string]string{}
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &respJSON)
assert.Equal(t, "The repository with the same name already exists.", respJSON["message"])
})
}
// mirror-sync must fail with "400 (Bad Request)" when an attempt is made to
// sync a non-mirror repository.
func TestAPIMirrorSyncNonMirrorRepo(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
session := loginUser(t, "user2")
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
var repo api.Repository
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/api/v1/repos/user2/repo1")
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &repo)
assert.False(t, repo.Mirror)
req = NewRequestf(t, "POST", "/api/v1/repos/user2/repo1/mirror-sync").
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusBadRequest)
errRespJSON := map[string]string{}
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &errRespJSON)
assert.Equal(t, "Repository is not a mirror", errRespJSON["message"])
}
func TestAPIOrgRepoCreate(t *testing.T) {
testCases := []struct {
ctxUserID int64
orgName, repoName string
expectedStatus int
}{
{ctxUserID: 1, orgName: "org3", repoName: "repo-admin", expectedStatus: http.StatusCreated},
{ctxUserID: 2, orgName: "org3", repoName: "repo-own", expectedStatus: http.StatusCreated},
{ctxUserID: 2, orgName: "org6", repoName: "repo-bad-org", expectedStatus: http.StatusForbidden},
{ctxUserID: 28, orgName: "org3", repoName: "repo-creator", expectedStatus: http.StatusCreated},
{ctxUserID: 28, orgName: "org6", repoName: "repo-not-creator", expectedStatus: http.StatusForbidden},
}
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
for _, testCase := range testCases {
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: testCase.ctxUserID})
session := loginUser(t, user.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteOrganization, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/org/%s/repos", testCase.orgName), &api.CreateRepoOption{
Name: testCase.repoName,
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, testCase.expectedStatus)
}
}
func TestAPIRepoCreateConflict(t *testing.T) {
onGiteaRun(t, testAPIRepoCreateConflict)
}
func testAPIRepoCreateConflict(t *testing.T, u *url.URL) {
username := "user2"
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
baseAPITestContext := NewAPITestContext(t, username, "repo1", auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
u.Path = baseAPITestContext.GitPath()
t.Run("Existing", func(t *testing.T) {
httpContext := baseAPITestContext
httpContext.Reponame = "repo-tmp-17"
t.Run("CreateRepo", doAPICreateRepository(httpContext, false))
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", "/api/v1/user/repos",
&api.CreateRepoOption{
Name: httpContext.Reponame,
}).
AddTokenAuth(httpContext.Token)
resp := httpContext.Session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusConflict)
respJSON := map[string]string{}
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &respJSON)
assert.Equal(t, "The repository with the same name already exists.", respJSON["message"])
})
}
func TestAPIRepoTransfer(t *testing.T) {
testCases := []struct {
ctxUserID int64
newOwner string
teams *[]int64
expectedStatus int
}{
// Disclaimer for test story: "user1" is an admin, "user2" is normal user and part of in owner team of org "org3"
// Transfer to a user with teams in another org should fail
{ctxUserID: 1, newOwner: "org3", teams: &[]int64{5}, expectedStatus: http.StatusForbidden},
// Transfer to a user with non-existent team IDs should fail
{ctxUserID: 1, newOwner: "user2", teams: &[]int64{2}, expectedStatus: http.StatusUnprocessableEntity},
// Transfer should go through
{ctxUserID: 1, newOwner: "org3", teams: &[]int64{2}, expectedStatus: http.StatusAccepted},
// Let user transfer it back to himself
{ctxUserID: 2, newOwner: "user2", expectedStatus: http.StatusAccepted},
// And revert transfer
{ctxUserID: 2, newOwner: "org3", teams: &[]int64{2}, expectedStatus: http.StatusAccepted},
// Cannot start transfer to an existing repo
{ctxUserID: 2, newOwner: "org3", teams: nil, expectedStatus: http.StatusUnprocessableEntity},
// Start transfer, repo is now in pending transfer mode
{ctxUserID: 2, newOwner: "org6", teams: nil, expectedStatus: http.StatusCreated},
}
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
// create repo to move
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 1})
session := loginUser(t, user.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
repoName := "moveME"
apiRepo := new(api.Repository)
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", "/api/v1/user/repos", &api.CreateRepoOption{
Name: repoName,
Description: "repo move around",
Private: false,
Readme: "Default",
AutoInit: true,
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, apiRepo)
// start testing
for _, testCase := range testCases {
user = unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: testCase.ctxUserID})
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: apiRepo.ID})
session = loginUser(t, user.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
token = getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/transfer", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name), &api.TransferRepoOption{
NewOwner: testCase.newOwner,
TeamIDs: testCase.teams,
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, testCase.expectedStatus)
}
// cleanup
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: apiRepo.ID})
_ = repo_service.DeleteRepositoryDirectly(db.DefaultContext, user, repo.ID)
}
func transfer(t *testing.T) *repo_model.Repository {
// create repo to move
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
session := loginUser(t, user.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
repoName := "moveME"
apiRepo := new(api.Repository)
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", "/api/v1/user/repos", &api.CreateRepoOption{
Name: repoName,
Description: "repo move around",
Private: false,
Readme: "Default",
AutoInit: true,
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, apiRepo)
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: apiRepo.ID})
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/transfer", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name), &api.TransferRepoOption{
NewOwner: "user4",
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
return repo
}
func TestAPIAcceptTransfer(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
repo := transfer(t)
// try to accept with not authorized user
session := loginUser(t, "user2")
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
req := NewRequest(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/transfer/reject", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name)).
AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusForbidden)
// try to accept repo that's not marked as transferred
req = NewRequest(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/transfer/accept", "user2", "repo1")).
AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNotFound)
// accept transfer
session = loginUser(t, "user4")
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
token = getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser)
req = NewRequest(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/transfer/accept", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name)).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusAccepted)
apiRepo := new(api.Repository)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, apiRepo)
assert.Equal(t, "user4", apiRepo.Owner.UserName)
}
func TestAPIRejectTransfer(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
repo := transfer(t)
// try to reject with not authorized user
session := loginUser(t, "user2")
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req := NewRequest(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/transfer/reject", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name)).
AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusForbidden)
// try to reject repo that's not marked as transferred
req = NewRequest(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/transfer/reject", "user2", "repo1")).
AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNotFound)
// reject transfer
session = loginUser(t, "user4")
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
token = getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
req = NewRequest(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/transfer/reject", repo.OwnerName, repo.Name)).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
apiRepo := new(api.Repository)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, apiRepo)
assert.Equal(t, "user2", apiRepo.Owner.UserName)
}
func TestAPIGenerateRepo(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 1})
session := loginUser(t, user.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
templateRepo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 44})
// user
repo := new(api.Repository)
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/generate", templateRepo.OwnerName, templateRepo.Name), &api.GenerateRepoOption{
Owner: user.Name,
Name: "new-repo",
Description: "test generate repo",
Private: false,
GitContent: true,
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, repo)
assert.Equal(t, "new-repo", repo.Name)
// org
req = NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/generate", templateRepo.OwnerName, templateRepo.Name), &api.GenerateRepoOption{
Owner: "org3",
Name: "new-repo",
Description: "test generate repo",
Private: false,
GitContent: true,
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, repo)
assert.Equal(t, "new-repo", repo.Name)
}
func TestAPIRepoGetReviewers(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
session := loginUser(t, user.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeReadRepository)
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
req := NewRequestf(t, "GET", "/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/reviewers", user.Name, repo.Name).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
var reviewers []*api.User
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &reviewers)
if assert.Len(t, reviewers, 1) {
assert.ElementsMatch(t, []int64{2}, []int64{reviewers[0].ID})
}
}
func TestAPIRepoGetAssignees(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
session := loginUser(t, user.Name)
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeReadRepository)
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: 1})
req := NewRequestf(t, "GET", "/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/assignees", user.Name, repo.Name).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
var assignees []*api.User
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &assignees)
assert.Len(t, assignees, 1)
}