mirror
/
gitea
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
Git with a cup of tea, painless self-hosted git service Mirror for internal git.with.parts use https://git.with.parts
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
17286 Commits
17 Branches
214 Tags
5.0 GiB
Tag: Branch: Tree: 267dbb4e93
Branches Tags
${ item.name }
Create tag ${ searchTerm }
Create branch ${ searchTerm }
from '267dbb4e93'
${ noResults }
gitea/models/fixtures/org_user.yml

102 lines
880 B
Raw Normal View History Unescape

Unit tests for models/access.go (#606)
8 years ago
-
id: 1
uid: 2
org_id: 3
is_public: true
Unit tests and bug fix for models/org
8 years ago
-
id: 2
uid: 4
org_id: 3
is_public: false
-
id: 3
uid: 5
org_id: 6
is_public: true
-
id: 4
uid: 5
org_id: 7
is_public: false
Expand fixtures (#2571) * Add more repo search tests * Add and fix /api/repo/search integration tests * Add owner to access table for organization repositories * Remove tests
7 years ago
-
id: 5
uid: 15
org_id: 17
is_public: true
Fix repository search function (#2689) * Fix and remove FIXME * Respect membership visibility * Fix/rewrite searchRepositoryByName function * Add unit tests * Add integration tests * Remove Searcher completely * Remove trailing space
7 years ago
-
id: 6
uid: 18
org_id: 17
is_public: false
Add search mode option to /api/repo/search (#2756) * Add repo type option to /api/repo/search * Add tests and fix result of collaborative filter in specific condition * Fix/optimize search & tests * Improve integration tests * Fix lint errors * Fix unit tests * Change and improve internal implementation of repo search * Use NonexistentID * Make search api more general * Change mirror and fork search behaviour * Fix tests & typo in comment
7 years ago
-
id: 7
uid: 20
org_id: 19
is_public: true
org/members: display 2FA members states + optimize sql requests (#7621) * org/members: display 2FA state * fix comment typo * lay down UserList bases * add basic test for previous methods * add comment for UserList type * add valid two-fa account * test new UserList methods * optimize MembersIsPublic by side loading info on GetMembers + fix integrations tests * respect fmt rules * use map for data * Optimize GetTwoFaStatus * rewrite by using existing sub func * Optimize IsUserOrgOwner * remove un-used code * tests: cover empty org + fix import order * tests: add ErrTeamNotExist path * tests: fix wrong expected result
5 years ago
-
id: 8
uid: 24
org_id: 25
is_public: true
Team permission to create repository in organization (#8312) * Add team permission setting to allow creating repo in organization. Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com> * Add test case for creating repo when have team creation access. Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com> * build error: should omit comparison to bool constant Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com> * Add comment on exported functions * Fix fixture consistency, fix existing unit tests * Fix boolean comparison in xorm query. * addCollaborator and changeCollaborationAccessMode separate steps More clear to use different if-cases. * Create and commit xorm session * fix * Add information of create repo permission in team sidebar * Add migration step * Clarify that repository creator will be administrator. * Fix some things after merge * Fix language text that use html * migrations file * Create repository permission -> Create repositories * fix merge * fix review comments
5 years ago
-
id: 9
uid: 28
org_id: 3
is_public: true
-
id: 10
uid: 28
org_id: 6
is_public: true
Restricted users (#6274) * Restricted users (#4334): initial implementation * Add User.IsRestricted & UI to edit it * Pass user object instead of user id to places where IsRestricted flag matters * Restricted users: maintain access rows for all referenced repos (incl public) * Take logged in user & IsRestricted flag into account in org/repo listings, searches and accesses * Add basic repo access tests for restricted users Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * Mention restricted users in the faq Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * Revert unnecessary change `.isUserPartOfOrg` -> `.IsUserPartOfOrg` Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * Remove unnecessary `org.IsOrganization()` call Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * Revert to an `int64` keyed `accessMap` * Add type `userAccess` * Add convenience func updateUserAccess() * Turn accessMap into a `map[int64]userAccess` Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * or even better: `map[int64]*userAccess` * updateUserAccess(): use tighter syntax as suggested by lafriks * even tighter * Avoid extra loop * Don't disclose limited orgs to unauthenticated users * Don't assume block only applies to orgs * Use an array of `VisibleType` for filtering * fix yet another thinko * Ok - no need for u * Revert "Ok - no need for u" This reverts commit 5c3e886aabd5acd997a3b35687d322439732c200. Co-authored-by: Antoine GIRARD <sapk@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
5 years ago
-
id: 11
uid: 29
org_id: 17
is_public: true
Fix SQL Query for `SearchTeam` (#20844) - Currently the function takes in the `UserID` option, but isn't being used within the SQL query. This patch fixes that by checking that only teams are being returned that the user belongs to. Fix #20829 Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2 years ago
-
id: 12
uid: 2
org_id: 17
is_public: true
Fix user visible check (#21210) Fixes #21206 If user and viewer are equal the method should return true. Also the common organization check was wrong as `count` can never be less then 0. Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2 years ago
-
id: 13
uid: 31
org_id: 19
is_public: true
Improve permission check of packages (#23879) At first, we have one unified team unit permission which is called `Team.Authorize` in DB. But since https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/17811, we allowed different units to have different permission. The old code is only designed for the old version. So after #17811, if org users have write permission of other units, but have no permission of packages, they can also get write permission of packages. Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2 years ago
-
id: 14
uid: 5
org_id: 23
is_public: false
Revert package access change from #23879 (#25707) Fixes (?) #25538 Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/972 Regression #23879 #23879 introduced a change which prevents read access to packages if a user is not a member of an organization. That PR also contained a change which disallows package access if the team unit is configured with "no access" for packages. I don't think this change makes sense (at the moment). It may be relevant for private orgs. But for public or limited orgs that's useless because an unauthorized user would have more access rights than the team member. This PR restores the old behaviour "If a user has read access for an owner, they can read packages". --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
1 year ago
-
id: 15
uid: 1
org_id: 35
is_public: true
-
id: 16
uid: 1
org_id: 36
is_public: true
-
id: 17
uid: 5
org_id: 36
is_public: true