Git with a cup of tea, painless self-hosted git service Mirror for internal git.with.parts use https://git.with.parts
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
gitea/models/perm/access/repo_permission.go

433 lines
13 KiB

// Copyright 2018 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a MIT-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
package access
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/organization"
perm_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/perm"
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unit"
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/log"
)
// Permission contains all the permissions related variables to a repository for a user
type Permission struct {
AccessMode perm_model.AccessMode
Units []*repo_model.RepoUnit
UnitsMode map[unit.Type]perm_model.AccessMode
}
// IsOwner returns true if current user is the owner of repository.
func (p *Permission) IsOwner() bool {
return p.AccessMode >= perm_model.AccessModeOwner
}
// IsAdmin returns true if current user has admin or higher access of repository.
func (p *Permission) IsAdmin() bool {
return p.AccessMode >= perm_model.AccessModeAdmin
}
// HasAccess returns true if the current user has at least read access to any unit of this repository
func (p *Permission) HasAccess() bool {
if p.UnitsMode == nil {
return p.AccessMode >= perm_model.AccessModeRead
}
return len(p.UnitsMode) > 0
}
// UnitAccessMode returns current user accessmode to the specify unit of the repository
func (p *Permission) UnitAccessMode(unitType unit.Type) perm_model.AccessMode {
if p.UnitsMode == nil {
for _, u := range p.Units {
if u.Type == unitType {
return p.AccessMode
}
}
return perm_model.AccessModeNone
}
return p.UnitsMode[unitType]
}
// CanAccess returns true if user has mode access to the unit of the repository
func (p *Permission) CanAccess(mode perm_model.AccessMode, unitType unit.Type) bool {
return p.UnitAccessMode(unitType) >= mode
}
// CanAccessAny returns true if user has mode access to any of the units of the repository
func (p *Permission) CanAccessAny(mode perm_model.AccessMode, unitTypes ...unit.Type) bool {
for _, u := range unitTypes {
if p.CanAccess(mode, u) {
return true
}
}
return false
}
// CanRead returns true if user could read to this unit
func (p *Permission) CanRead(unitType unit.Type) bool {
return p.CanAccess(perm_model.AccessModeRead, unitType)
}
// CanReadAny returns true if user has read access to any of the units of the repository
func (p *Permission) CanReadAny(unitTypes ...unit.Type) bool {
return p.CanAccessAny(perm_model.AccessModeRead, unitTypes...)
}
// CanReadIssuesOrPulls returns true if isPull is true and user could read pull requests and
// returns true if isPull is false and user could read to issues
func (p *Permission) CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull bool) bool {
if isPull {
return p.CanRead(unit.TypePullRequests)
}
return p.CanRead(unit.TypeIssues)
}
// CanWrite returns true if user could write to this unit
func (p *Permission) CanWrite(unitType unit.Type) bool {
return p.CanAccess(perm_model.AccessModeWrite, unitType)
}
// CanWriteIssuesOrPulls returns true if isPull is true and user could write to pull requests and
// returns true if isPull is false and user could write to issues
func (p *Permission) CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(isPull bool) bool {
if isPull {
return p.CanWrite(unit.TypePullRequests)
}
return p.CanWrite(unit.TypeIssues)
}
// ColorFormat writes a colored string for these Permissions
func (p *Permission) ColorFormat(s fmt.State) {
noColor := log.ColorBytes(log.Reset)
format := "perm_model.AccessMode: %-v, %d Units, %d UnitsMode(s): [ "
args := []interface{}{
p.AccessMode,
log.NewColoredValueBytes(len(p.Units), &noColor),
log.NewColoredValueBytes(len(p.UnitsMode), &noColor),
}
if s.Flag('+') {
for i, unit := range p.Units {
config := ""
if unit.Config != nil {
configBytes, err := unit.Config.ToDB()
config = string(configBytes)
if err != nil {
config = err.Error()
}
}
format += "\nUnits[%d]: ID: %d RepoID: %d Type: %-v Config: %s"
args = append(args,
log.NewColoredValueBytes(i, &noColor),
log.NewColoredIDValue(unit.ID),
log.NewColoredIDValue(unit.RepoID),
unit.Type,
config)
}
for key, value := range p.UnitsMode {
format += "\nUnitMode[%-v]: %-v"
args = append(args,
key,
value)
}
} else {
format += "..."
}
format += " ]"
log.ColorFprintf(s, format, args...)
}
// GetUserRepoPermission returns the user permissions to the repository
func GetUserRepoPermission(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, user *user_model.User) (perm Permission, err error) {
if log.IsTrace() {
defer func() {
if user == nil {
log.Trace("Permission Loaded for anonymous user in %-v:\nPermissions: %-+v",
repo,
perm)
return
}
log.Trace("Permission Loaded for %-v in %-v:\nPermissions: %-+v",
user,
repo,
perm)
}()
}
// anonymous user visit private repo.
// TODO: anonymous user visit public unit of private repo???
if user == nil && repo.IsPrivate {
perm.AccessMode = perm_model.AccessModeNone
return
}
var is bool
if user != nil {
is, err = repo_model.IsCollaborator(ctx, repo.ID, user.ID)
if err != nil {
return perm, err
}
}
if err = repo.GetOwner(ctx); err != nil {
return
}
// Prevent strangers from checking out public repo of private organization/users
// Allow user if they are collaborator of a repo within a private user or a private organization but not a member of the organization itself
if !organization.HasOrgOrUserVisible(ctx, repo.Owner, user) && !is {
perm.AccessMode = perm_model.AccessModeNone
return
}
if err = repo.LoadUnits(ctx); err != nil {
return
}
perm.Units = repo.Units
// anonymous visit public repo
if user == nil {
perm.AccessMode = perm_model.AccessModeRead
return
}
// Admin or the owner has super access to the repository
if user.IsAdmin || user.ID == repo.OwnerID {
perm.AccessMode = perm_model.AccessModeOwner
return
}
// plain user
perm.AccessMode, err = accessLevel(ctx, user, repo)
if err != nil {
return
}
if err = repo.GetOwner(ctx); err != nil {
return
}
if !repo.Owner.IsOrganization() {
return
}
perm.UnitsMode = make(map[unit.Type]perm_model.AccessMode)
// Collaborators on organization
if is {
for _, u := range repo.Units {
perm.UnitsMode[u.Type] = perm.AccessMode
}
}
// get units mode from teams
teams, err := organization.GetUserRepoTeams(ctx, repo.OwnerID, user.ID, repo.ID)
if err != nil {
return
}
// if user in an owner team
for _, team := range teams {
Team permission allow different unit has different permission (#17811) * Team permission allow different unit has different permission * Finish the interface and the logic * Fix lint * Fix translation * align center for table cell content * Fix fixture * merge * Fix test * Add deprecated * Improve code * Add tooltip * Fix swagger * Fix newline * Fix tests * Fix tests * Fix test * Fix test * Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read * Move team units with limited max level below units table * Update label and column names * Some improvements * Fix lint * Some improvements * Fix template variables * Add permission docs * improve doc * Fix fixture * Fix bug * Fix some bug * fix * gofumpt * Integration test for migration (#18124) integrations: basic test for Gitea {dump,restore}-repo This is a first step for integration testing of DumpRepository and RestoreRepository. It: runs a Gitea server, dumps a repo via DumpRepository to the filesystem, restores the repo via RestoreRepository from the filesystem, dumps the restored repository to the filesystem, compares the first and second dump and expects them to be identical The verification is trivial and the goal is to add more tests for each topic of the dump. Signed-off-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org> * Team permission allow different unit has different permission * Finish the interface and the logic * Fix lint * Fix translation * align center for table cell content * Fix fixture * merge * Fix test * Add deprecated * Improve code * Add tooltip * Fix swagger * Fix newline * Fix tests * Fix tests * Fix test * Fix test * Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read * Move team units with limited max level below units table * Update label and column names * Some improvements * Fix lint * Some improvements * Fix template variables * Add permission docs * improve doc * Fix fixture * Fix bug * Fix some bug * Fix bug Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Aravinth Manivannan <realaravinth@batsense.net>
3 years ago
if team.AccessMode >= perm_model.AccessModeAdmin {
perm.AccessMode = perm_model.AccessModeOwner
perm.UnitsMode = nil
return
}
}
for _, u := range repo.Units {
var found bool
for _, team := range teams {
teamMode := team.UnitAccessModeCtx(ctx, u.Type)
Team permission allow different unit has different permission (#17811) * Team permission allow different unit has different permission * Finish the interface and the logic * Fix lint * Fix translation * align center for table cell content * Fix fixture * merge * Fix test * Add deprecated * Improve code * Add tooltip * Fix swagger * Fix newline * Fix tests * Fix tests * Fix test * Fix test * Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read * Move team units with limited max level below units table * Update label and column names * Some improvements * Fix lint * Some improvements * Fix template variables * Add permission docs * improve doc * Fix fixture * Fix bug * Fix some bug * fix * gofumpt * Integration test for migration (#18124) integrations: basic test for Gitea {dump,restore}-repo This is a first step for integration testing of DumpRepository and RestoreRepository. It: runs a Gitea server, dumps a repo via DumpRepository to the filesystem, restores the repo via RestoreRepository from the filesystem, dumps the restored repository to the filesystem, compares the first and second dump and expects them to be identical The verification is trivial and the goal is to add more tests for each topic of the dump. Signed-off-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org> * Team permission allow different unit has different permission * Finish the interface and the logic * Fix lint * Fix translation * align center for table cell content * Fix fixture * merge * Fix test * Add deprecated * Improve code * Add tooltip * Fix swagger * Fix newline * Fix tests * Fix tests * Fix test * Fix test * Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read * Move team units with limited max level below units table * Update label and column names * Some improvements * Fix lint * Some improvements * Fix template variables * Add permission docs * improve doc * Fix fixture * Fix bug * Fix some bug * Fix bug Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Aravinth Manivannan <realaravinth@batsense.net>
3 years ago
if teamMode > perm_model.AccessModeNone {
m := perm.UnitsMode[u.Type]
Team permission allow different unit has different permission (#17811) * Team permission allow different unit has different permission * Finish the interface and the logic * Fix lint * Fix translation * align center for table cell content * Fix fixture * merge * Fix test * Add deprecated * Improve code * Add tooltip * Fix swagger * Fix newline * Fix tests * Fix tests * Fix test * Fix test * Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read * Move team units with limited max level below units table * Update label and column names * Some improvements * Fix lint * Some improvements * Fix template variables * Add permission docs * improve doc * Fix fixture * Fix bug * Fix some bug * fix * gofumpt * Integration test for migration (#18124) integrations: basic test for Gitea {dump,restore}-repo This is a first step for integration testing of DumpRepository and RestoreRepository. It: runs a Gitea server, dumps a repo via DumpRepository to the filesystem, restores the repo via RestoreRepository from the filesystem, dumps the restored repository to the filesystem, compares the first and second dump and expects them to be identical The verification is trivial and the goal is to add more tests for each topic of the dump. Signed-off-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org> * Team permission allow different unit has different permission * Finish the interface and the logic * Fix lint * Fix translation * align center for table cell content * Fix fixture * merge * Fix test * Add deprecated * Improve code * Add tooltip * Fix swagger * Fix newline * Fix tests * Fix tests * Fix test * Fix test * Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read * Move team units with limited max level below units table * Update label and column names * Some improvements * Fix lint * Some improvements * Fix template variables * Add permission docs * improve doc * Fix fixture * Fix bug * Fix some bug * Fix bug Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Aravinth Manivannan <realaravinth@batsense.net>
3 years ago
if m < teamMode {
perm.UnitsMode[u.Type] = teamMode
}
found = true
}
}
Restricted users (#6274) * Restricted users (#4334): initial implementation * Add User.IsRestricted & UI to edit it * Pass user object instead of user id to places where IsRestricted flag matters * Restricted users: maintain access rows for all referenced repos (incl public) * Take logged in user & IsRestricted flag into account in org/repo listings, searches and accesses * Add basic repo access tests for restricted users Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * Mention restricted users in the faq Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * Revert unnecessary change `.isUserPartOfOrg` -> `.IsUserPartOfOrg` Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * Remove unnecessary `org.IsOrganization()` call Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * Revert to an `int64` keyed `accessMap` * Add type `userAccess` * Add convenience func updateUserAccess() * Turn accessMap into a `map[int64]userAccess` Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * or even better: `map[int64]*userAccess` * updateUserAccess(): use tighter syntax as suggested by lafriks * even tighter * Avoid extra loop * Don't disclose limited orgs to unauthenticated users * Don't assume block only applies to orgs * Use an array of `VisibleType` for filtering * fix yet another thinko * Ok - no need for u * Revert "Ok - no need for u" This reverts commit 5c3e886aabd5acd997a3b35687d322439732c200. Co-authored-by: Antoine GIRARD <sapk@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
5 years ago
// for a public repo on an organization, a non-restricted user has read permission on non-team defined units.
if !found && !repo.IsPrivate && !user.IsRestricted {
if _, ok := perm.UnitsMode[u.Type]; !ok {
perm.UnitsMode[u.Type] = perm_model.AccessModeRead
}
}
}
// remove no permission units
perm.Units = make([]*repo_model.RepoUnit, 0, len(repo.Units))
for t := range perm.UnitsMode {
for _, u := range repo.Units {
if u.Type == t {
perm.Units = append(perm.Units, u)
}
}
}
return
}
// IsUserRealRepoAdmin check if this user is real repo admin
func IsUserRealRepoAdmin(repo *repo_model.Repository, user *user_model.User) (bool, error) {
if repo.OwnerID == user.ID {
return true, nil
}
if err := repo.GetOwner(db.DefaultContext); err != nil {
return false, err
}
accessMode, err := accessLevel(db.DefaultContext, user, repo)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
return accessMode >= perm_model.AccessModeAdmin, nil
}
// IsUserRepoAdmin return true if user has admin right of a repo
func IsUserRepoAdmin(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, user *user_model.User) (bool, error) {
if user == nil || repo == nil {
return false, nil
}
if user.IsAdmin {
return true, nil
}
mode, err := accessLevel(ctx, user, repo)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
if mode >= perm_model.AccessModeAdmin {
return true, nil
}
teams, err := organization.GetUserRepoTeams(ctx, repo.OwnerID, user.ID, repo.ID)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
for _, team := range teams {
Team permission allow different unit has different permission (#17811) * Team permission allow different unit has different permission * Finish the interface and the logic * Fix lint * Fix translation * align center for table cell content * Fix fixture * merge * Fix test * Add deprecated * Improve code * Add tooltip * Fix swagger * Fix newline * Fix tests * Fix tests * Fix test * Fix test * Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read * Move team units with limited max level below units table * Update label and column names * Some improvements * Fix lint * Some improvements * Fix template variables * Add permission docs * improve doc * Fix fixture * Fix bug * Fix some bug * fix * gofumpt * Integration test for migration (#18124) integrations: basic test for Gitea {dump,restore}-repo This is a first step for integration testing of DumpRepository and RestoreRepository. It: runs a Gitea server, dumps a repo via DumpRepository to the filesystem, restores the repo via RestoreRepository from the filesystem, dumps the restored repository to the filesystem, compares the first and second dump and expects them to be identical The verification is trivial and the goal is to add more tests for each topic of the dump. Signed-off-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org> * Team permission allow different unit has different permission * Finish the interface and the logic * Fix lint * Fix translation * align center for table cell content * Fix fixture * merge * Fix test * Add deprecated * Improve code * Add tooltip * Fix swagger * Fix newline * Fix tests * Fix tests * Fix test * Fix test * Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read * Move team units with limited max level below units table * Update label and column names * Some improvements * Fix lint * Some improvements * Fix template variables * Add permission docs * improve doc * Fix fixture * Fix bug * Fix some bug * Fix bug Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Aravinth Manivannan <realaravinth@batsense.net>
3 years ago
if team.AccessMode >= perm_model.AccessModeAdmin {
return true, nil
}
}
return false, nil
}
// AccessLevel returns the Access a user has to a repository. Will return NoneAccess if the
// user does not have access.
func AccessLevel(user *user_model.User, repo *repo_model.Repository) (perm_model.AccessMode, error) { //nolint
return AccessLevelUnit(user, repo, unit.TypeCode)
}
// AccessLevelUnit returns the Access a user has to a repository's. Will return NoneAccess if the
// user does not have access.
func AccessLevelUnit(user *user_model.User, repo *repo_model.Repository, unitType unit.Type) (perm_model.AccessMode, error) { //nolint
return accessLevelUnit(db.DefaultContext, user, repo, unitType)
}
func accessLevelUnit(ctx context.Context, user *user_model.User, repo *repo_model.Repository, unitType unit.Type) (perm_model.AccessMode, error) {
perm, err := GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, repo, user)
if err != nil {
return perm_model.AccessModeNone, err
}
return perm.UnitAccessMode(unitType), nil
}
// HasAccessUnit returns true if user has testMode to the unit of the repository
func HasAccessUnit(ctx context.Context, user *user_model.User, repo *repo_model.Repository, unitType unit.Type, testMode perm_model.AccessMode) (bool, error) {
mode, err := accessLevelUnit(ctx, user, repo, unitType)
return testMode <= mode, err
}
// CanBeAssigned return true if user can be assigned to issue or pull requests in repo
// Currently any write access (code, issues or pr's) is assignable, to match assignee list in user interface.
// FIXME: user could send PullRequest also could be assigned???
func CanBeAssigned(ctx context.Context, user *user_model.User, repo *repo_model.Repository, _ bool) (bool, error) {
if user.IsOrganization() {
return false, fmt.Errorf("Organization can't be added as assignee [user_id: %d, repo_id: %d]", user.ID, repo.ID)
}
perm, err := GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, repo, user)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
return perm.CanAccessAny(perm_model.AccessModeWrite, unit.TypeCode, unit.TypeIssues, unit.TypePullRequests), nil
}
// HasAccess returns true if user has access to repo
func HasAccess(ctx context.Context, userID int64, repo *repo_model.Repository) (bool, error) {
var user *user_model.User
var err error
if userID > 0 {
user, err = user_model.GetUserByIDCtx(ctx, userID)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
}
perm, err := GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, repo, user)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
return perm.HasAccess(), nil
}
// getUsersWithAccessMode returns users that have at least given access mode to the repository.
func getUsersWithAccessMode(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, mode perm_model.AccessMode) (_ []*user_model.User, err error) {
if err = repo.GetOwner(ctx); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
e := db.GetEngine(ctx)
accesses := make([]*Access, 0, 10)
if err = e.Where("repo_id = ? AND mode >= ?", repo.ID, mode).Find(&accesses); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
// Leave a seat for owner itself to append later, but if owner is an organization
// and just waste 1 unit is cheaper than re-allocate memory once.
users := make([]*user_model.User, 0, len(accesses)+1)
if len(accesses) > 0 {
userIDs := make([]int64, len(accesses))
for i := 0; i < len(accesses); i++ {
userIDs[i] = accesses[i].UserID
}
if err = e.In("id", userIDs).Find(&users); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
}
if !repo.Owner.IsOrganization() {
users = append(users, repo.Owner)
}
return users, nil
}
// GetRepoReaders returns all users that have explicit read access or higher to the repository.
func GetRepoReaders(repo *repo_model.Repository) (_ []*user_model.User, err error) {
return getUsersWithAccessMode(db.DefaultContext, repo, perm_model.AccessModeRead)
}
// GetRepoWriters returns all users that have write access to the repository.
func GetRepoWriters(repo *repo_model.Repository) (_ []*user_model.User, err error) {
return getUsersWithAccessMode(db.DefaultContext, repo, perm_model.AccessModeWrite)
}
// IsRepoReader returns true if user has explicit read access or higher to the repository.
func IsRepoReader(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, userID int64) (bool, error) {
if repo.OwnerID == userID {
return true, nil
}
return db.GetEngine(ctx).Where("repo_id = ? AND user_id = ? AND mode >= ?", repo.ID, userID, perm_model.AccessModeRead).Get(&Access{})
}