|
|
|
// Copyright 2017 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
package integration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
|
|
"bytes"
|
|
|
|
"context"
|
|
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
|
|
"net/http"
|
|
|
|
"net/http/httptest"
|
|
|
|
"net/url"
|
|
|
|
"os"
|
|
|
|
"path"
|
|
|
|
"strings"
|
|
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models"
|
|
|
|
auth_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/auth"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
|
|
|
|
issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues"
|
|
|
|
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
|
|
|
|
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/webhook"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/git"
|
|
|
|
repo_module "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/repository"
|
|
|
|
api "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/test"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/translation"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/services/pull"
|
|
|
|
repo_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/repository"
|
|
|
|
files_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/repository/files"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func testPullMerge(t *testing.T, session *TestSession, user, repo, pullnum string, mergeStyle repo_model.MergeStyle) *httptest.ResponseRecorder {
|
|
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", path.Join(user, repo, "pulls", pullnum))
|
|
|
|
resp := session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
htmlDoc := NewHTMLParser(t, resp.Body)
|
|
|
|
link := path.Join(user, repo, "pulls", pullnum, "merge")
|
|
|
|
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", link, map[string]string{
|
|
|
|
"_csrf": htmlDoc.GetCSRF(),
|
|
|
|
"do": string(mergeStyle),
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
resp = session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusSeeOther)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return resp
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func testPullCleanUp(t *testing.T, session *TestSession, user, repo, pullnum string) *httptest.ResponseRecorder {
|
|
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", path.Join(user, repo, "pulls", pullnum))
|
|
|
|
resp := session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Click the little green button to create a pull
|
|
|
|
htmlDoc := NewHTMLParser(t, resp.Body)
|
|
|
|
link, exists := htmlDoc.doc.Find(".timeline-item .delete-button").Attr("data-url")
|
|
|
|
assert.True(t, exists, "The template has changed, can not find delete button url")
|
|
|
|
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", link, map[string]string{
|
|
|
|
"_csrf": htmlDoc.GetCSRF(),
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
resp = session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return resp
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestPullMerge(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, giteaURL *url.URL) {
|
|
|
|
hookTasks, err := webhook.HookTasks(1, 1) // Retrieve previous hook number
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
hookTasksLenBefore := len(hookTasks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, "user1")
|
|
|
|
testRepoFork(t, session, "user2", "repo1", "user1", "repo1")
|
|
|
|
testEditFile(t, session, "user1", "repo1", "master", "README.md", "Hello, World (Edited)\n")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
resp := testPullCreate(t, session, "user1", "repo1", "master", "This is a pull title")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
elem := strings.Split(test.RedirectURL(resp), "/")
|
|
|
|
assert.EqualValues(t, "pulls", elem[3])
|
|
|
|
testPullMerge(t, session, elem[1], elem[2], elem[4], repo_model.MergeStyleMerge)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hookTasks, err = webhook.HookTasks(1, 1)
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
assert.Len(t, hookTasks, hookTasksLenBefore+1)
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestPullRebase(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, giteaURL *url.URL) {
|
|
|
|
hookTasks, err := webhook.HookTasks(1, 1) // Retrieve previous hook number
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
hookTasksLenBefore := len(hookTasks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, "user1")
|
|
|
|
testRepoFork(t, session, "user2", "repo1", "user1", "repo1")
|
|
|
|
testEditFile(t, session, "user1", "repo1", "master", "README.md", "Hello, World (Edited)\n")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
resp := testPullCreate(t, session, "user1", "repo1", "master", "This is a pull title")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
elem := strings.Split(test.RedirectURL(resp), "/")
|
|
|
|
assert.EqualValues(t, "pulls", elem[3])
|
|
|
|
testPullMerge(t, session, elem[1], elem[2], elem[4], repo_model.MergeStyleRebase)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hookTasks, err = webhook.HookTasks(1, 1)
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
assert.Len(t, hookTasks, hookTasksLenBefore+1)
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestPullRebaseMerge(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, giteaURL *url.URL) {
|
|
|
|
hookTasks, err := webhook.HookTasks(1, 1) // Retrieve previous hook number
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
hookTasksLenBefore := len(hookTasks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, "user1")
|
|
|
|
testRepoFork(t, session, "user2", "repo1", "user1", "repo1")
|
|
|
|
testEditFile(t, session, "user1", "repo1", "master", "README.md", "Hello, World (Edited)\n")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
resp := testPullCreate(t, session, "user1", "repo1", "master", "This is a pull title")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
elem := strings.Split(test.RedirectURL(resp), "/")
|
|
|
|
assert.EqualValues(t, "pulls", elem[3])
|
|
|
|
testPullMerge(t, session, elem[1], elem[2], elem[4], repo_model.MergeStyleRebaseMerge)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hookTasks, err = webhook.HookTasks(1, 1)
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
assert.Len(t, hookTasks, hookTasksLenBefore+1)
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestPullSquash(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, giteaURL *url.URL) {
|
|
|
|
hookTasks, err := webhook.HookTasks(1, 1) // Retrieve previous hook number
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
hookTasksLenBefore := len(hookTasks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, "user1")
|
|
|
|
testRepoFork(t, session, "user2", "repo1", "user1", "repo1")
|
|
|
|
testEditFile(t, session, "user1", "repo1", "master", "README.md", "Hello, World (Edited)\n")
|
|
|
|
testEditFile(t, session, "user1", "repo1", "master", "README.md", "Hello, World (Edited!)\n")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
resp := testPullCreate(t, session, "user1", "repo1", "master", "This is a pull title")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
elem := strings.Split(test.RedirectURL(resp), "/")
|
|
|
|
assert.EqualValues(t, "pulls", elem[3])
|
|
|
|
testPullMerge(t, session, elem[1], elem[2], elem[4], repo_model.MergeStyleSquash)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hookTasks, err = webhook.HookTasks(1, 1)
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
assert.Len(t, hookTasks, hookTasksLenBefore+1)
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestPullCleanUpAfterMerge(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, giteaURL *url.URL) {
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, "user1")
|
|
|
|
testRepoFork(t, session, "user2", "repo1", "user1", "repo1")
|
|
|
|
testEditFileToNewBranch(t, session, "user1", "repo1", "master", "feature/test", "README.md", "Hello, World (Edited - TestPullCleanUpAfterMerge)\n")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
resp := testPullCreate(t, session, "user1", "repo1", "feature/test", "This is a pull title")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
elem := strings.Split(test.RedirectURL(resp), "/")
|
|
|
|
assert.EqualValues(t, "pulls", elem[3])
|
|
|
|
testPullMerge(t, session, elem[1], elem[2], elem[4], repo_model.MergeStyleMerge)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check PR branch deletion
|
|
|
|
resp = testPullCleanUp(t, session, elem[1], elem[2], elem[4])
|
|
|
|
respJSON := struct {
|
|
|
|
Redirect string
|
|
|
|
}{}
|
|
|
|
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &respJSON)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.NotEmpty(t, respJSON.Redirect, "Redirected URL is not found")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
elem = strings.Split(respJSON.Redirect, "/")
|
|
|
|
assert.EqualValues(t, "pulls", elem[3])
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check branch deletion result
|
|
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", respJSON.Redirect)
|
|
|
|
resp = session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
htmlDoc := NewHTMLParser(t, resp.Body)
|
|
|
|
resultMsg := htmlDoc.doc.Find(".ui.message>p").Text()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.EqualValues(t, "Branch \"user1/repo1:feature/test\" has been deleted.", resultMsg)
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestCantMergeWorkInProgress(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, giteaURL *url.URL) {
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, "user1")
|
|
|
|
testRepoFork(t, session, "user2", "repo1", "user1", "repo1")
|
|
|
|
testEditFile(t, session, "user1", "repo1", "master", "README.md", "Hello, World (Edited)\n")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
resp := testPullCreate(t, session, "user1", "repo1", "master", "[wip] This is a pull title")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", test.RedirectURL(resp))
|
|
|
|
resp = session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
|
|
|
|
htmlDoc := NewHTMLParser(t, resp.Body)
|
|
|
|
text := strings.TrimSpace(htmlDoc.doc.Find(".merge-section > .item").Last().Text())
|
|
|
|
assert.NotEmpty(t, text, "Can't find WIP text")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Contains(t, text, translation.NewLocale("en-US").Tr("repo.pulls.cannot_merge_work_in_progress"), "Unable to find WIP text")
|
|
|
|
assert.Contains(t, text, "[wip]", "Unable to find WIP text")
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestCantMergeConflict(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, giteaURL *url.URL) {
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, "user1")
|
|
|
|
testRepoFork(t, session, "user2", "repo1", "user1", "repo1")
|
|
|
|
testEditFileToNewBranch(t, session, "user1", "repo1", "master", "conflict", "README.md", "Hello, World (Edited Once)\n")
|
|
|
|
testEditFileToNewBranch(t, session, "user1", "repo1", "master", "base", "README.md", "Hello, World (Edited Twice)\n")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Use API to create a conflicting pr
|
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767)
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
- `activitypub`
- `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
- `misc`
- `notification`
- `organization`
- `package`
- `issue`
- `repository`
- `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
- `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection
### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">
## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error
## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- For example:
```go
m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
```
## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default
Closes #24501
Closes #24799
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
|
|
|
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
|
|
|
|
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls?token=%s", "user1", "repo1", token), &api.CreatePullRequestOption{
|
|
|
|
Head: "conflict",
|
|
|
|
Base: "base",
|
|
|
|
Title: "create a conflicting pr",
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now this PR will be marked conflict - or at least a race will do - so drop down to pure code at this point...
|
|
|
|
user1 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{
|
|
|
|
Name: "user1",
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
repo1 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{
|
|
|
|
OwnerID: user1.ID,
|
|
|
|
Name: "repo1",
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pr := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.PullRequest{
|
|
|
|
HeadRepoID: repo1.ID,
|
|
|
|
BaseRepoID: repo1.ID,
|
|
|
|
HeadBranch: "conflict",
|
|
|
|
BaseBranch: "base",
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gitRepo, err := git.OpenRepository(git.DefaultContext, repo_model.RepoPath(user1.Name, repo1.Name))
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = pull.Merge(context.Background(), pr, user1, gitRepo, repo_model.MergeStyleMerge, "", "CONFLICT", false)
|
|
|
|
assert.Error(t, err, "Merge should return an error due to conflict")
|
|
|
|
assert.True(t, models.IsErrMergeConflicts(err), "Merge error is not a conflict error")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = pull.Merge(context.Background(), pr, user1, gitRepo, repo_model.MergeStyleRebase, "", "CONFLICT", false)
|
|
|
|
assert.Error(t, err, "Merge should return an error due to conflict")
|
|
|
|
assert.True(t, models.IsErrRebaseConflicts(err), "Merge error is not a conflict error")
|
|
|
|
gitRepo.Close()
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestCantMergeUnrelated(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, giteaURL *url.URL) {
|
|
|
|
session := loginUser(t, "user1")
|
|
|
|
testRepoFork(t, session, "user2", "repo1", "user1", "repo1")
|
|
|
|
testEditFileToNewBranch(t, session, "user1", "repo1", "master", "base", "README.md", "Hello, World (Edited Twice)\n")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now we want to create a commit on a branch that is totally unrelated to our current head
|
|
|
|
// Drop down to pure code at this point
|
|
|
|
user1 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{
|
|
|
|
Name: "user1",
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
repo1 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{
|
|
|
|
OwnerID: user1.ID,
|
|
|
|
Name: "repo1",
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
path := repo_model.RepoPath(user1.Name, repo1.Name)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err := git.NewCommand(git.DefaultContext, "read-tree", "--empty").Run(&git.RunOpts{Dir: path})
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stdin := bytes.NewBufferString("Unrelated File")
|
|
|
|
var stdout strings.Builder
|
|
|
|
err = git.NewCommand(git.DefaultContext, "hash-object", "-w", "--stdin").Run(&git.RunOpts{
|
|
|
|
Dir: path,
|
|
|
|
Stdin: stdin,
|
|
|
|
Stdout: &stdout,
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
sha := strings.TrimSpace(stdout.String())
|
|
|
|
|
Refactor git command package to improve security and maintainability (#22678)
This PR follows #21535 (and replace #22592)
## Review without space diff
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22678/files?diff=split&w=1
## Purpose of this PR
1. Make git module command completely safe (risky user inputs won't be
passed as argument option anymore)
2. Avoid low-level mistakes like
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22098#discussion_r1045234918
3. Remove deprecated and dirty `CmdArgCheck` function, hide the `CmdArg`
type
4. Simplify code when using git command
## The main idea of this PR
* Move the `git.CmdArg` to the `internal` package, then no other package
except `git` could use it. Then developers could never do
`AddArguments(git.CmdArg(userInput))` any more.
* Introduce `git.ToTrustedCmdArgs`, it's for user-provided and already
trusted arguments. It's only used in a few cases, for example: use git
arguments from config file, help unit test with some arguments.
* Introduce `AddOptionValues` and `AddOptionFormat`, they make code more
clear and simple:
* Before: `AddArguments("-m").AddDynamicArguments(message)`
* After: `AddOptionValues("-m", message)`
* -
* Before: `AddArguments(git.CmdArg(fmt.Sprintf("--author='%s <%s>'",
sig.Name, sig.Email)))`
* After: `AddOptionFormat("--author='%s <%s>'", sig.Name, sig.Email)`
## FAQ
### Why these changes were not done in #21535 ?
#21535 is mainly a search&replace, it did its best to not change too
much logic.
Making the framework better needs a lot of changes, so this separate PR
is needed as the second step.
### The naming of `AddOptionXxx`
According to git's manual, the `--xxx` part is called `option`.
### How can it guarantee that `internal.CmdArg` won't be not misused?
Go's specification guarantees that. Trying to access other package's
internal package causes compilation error.
And, `golangci-lint` also denies the git/internal package. Only the
`git/command.go` can use it carefully.
### There is still a `ToTrustedCmdArgs`, will it still allow developers
to make mistakes and pass untrusted arguments?
Generally speaking, no. Because when using `ToTrustedCmdArgs`, the code
will be very complex (see the changes for examples). Then developers and
reviewers can know that something might be unreasonable.
### Why there was a `CmdArgCheck` and why it's removed?
At the moment of #21535, to reduce unnecessary changes, `CmdArgCheck`
was introduced as a hacky patch. Now, almost all code could be written
as `cmd := NewCommand(); cmd.AddXxx(...)`, then there is no need for
`CmdArgCheck` anymore.
### Why many codes for `signArg == ""` is deleted?
Because in the old code, `signArg` could never be empty string, it's
either `-S[key-id]` or `--no-gpg-sign`. So the `signArg == ""` is just
dead code.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2 years ago
|
|
|
_, _, err = git.NewCommand(git.DefaultContext, "update-index", "--add", "--replace", "--cacheinfo").AddDynamicArguments("100644", sha, "somewher-over-the-rainbow").RunStdString(&git.RunOpts{Dir: path})
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
treeSha, _, err := git.NewCommand(git.DefaultContext, "write-tree").RunStdString(&git.RunOpts{Dir: path})
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
treeSha = strings.TrimSpace(treeSha)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
commitTimeStr := time.Now().Format(time.RFC3339)
|
|
|
|
doerSig := user1.NewGitSig()
|
|
|
|
env := append(os.Environ(),
|
|
|
|
"GIT_AUTHOR_NAME="+doerSig.Name,
|
|
|
|
"GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL="+doerSig.Email,
|
|
|
|
"GIT_AUTHOR_DATE="+commitTimeStr,
|
|
|
|
"GIT_COMMITTER_NAME="+doerSig.Name,
|
|
|
|
"GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL="+doerSig.Email,
|
|
|
|
"GIT_COMMITTER_DATE="+commitTimeStr,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
messageBytes := new(bytes.Buffer)
|
|
|
|
_, _ = messageBytes.WriteString("Unrelated")
|
|
|
|
_, _ = messageBytes.WriteString("\n")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stdout.Reset()
|
|
|
|
err = git.NewCommand(git.DefaultContext, "commit-tree").AddDynamicArguments(treeSha).
|
|
|
|
Run(&git.RunOpts{
|
|
|
|
Env: env,
|
|
|
|
Dir: path,
|
|
|
|
Stdin: messageBytes,
|
|
|
|
Stdout: &stdout,
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
commitSha := strings.TrimSpace(stdout.String())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_, _, err = git.NewCommand(git.DefaultContext, "branch", "unrelated").AddDynamicArguments(commitSha).RunStdString(&git.RunOpts{Dir: path})
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
testEditFileToNewBranch(t, session, "user1", "repo1", "master", "conflict", "README.md", "Hello, World (Edited Once)\n")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Use API to create a conflicting pr
|
Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767)
## Changes
- Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and
`write` levels:
- `activitypub`
- `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin)
- `misc`
- `notification`
- `organization`
- `package`
- `issue`
- `repository`
- `user`
- Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to
`reqToken()`
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section
- _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is
included based on the section and HTTP method
- `reqToken()` is used for individual routes
- checks that required authentication is present (but does not check
scope levels as this will already have been handled by
`tokenRequiresScopes()`
- Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of
scopes
- Updates the user interface for scope selection
### User interface example
<img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3">
<img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c">
## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision
- `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes.
For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category
(say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say
`DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include
`delete:organization`.
- `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that
require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request,
`tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error
## TODO
- [x] Alphabetize scope categories
- [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public).
Also expand this to organizations
- [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show
warning
- [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api.
`tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct
scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other
auth) is present.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to
minimize access changes to existing user tokens.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what
read/write/delete levels correspond to
- [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly
deviates from the api definition.
- _This should be addressed in this PR_
- For example:
```go
m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() {
m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs)
m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions)
}, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser,
auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization),
context_service.UserAssignmentAPI())
```
## Future improvements
- [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation
- [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in
- [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository`
- [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display
text instead of an empty bullet point
- [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read
categories be selected by default
Closes #24501
Closes #24799
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
1 year ago
|
|
|
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
|
|
|
|
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls?token=%s", "user1", "repo1", token), &api.CreatePullRequestOption{
|
|
|
|
Head: "unrelated",
|
|
|
|
Base: "base",
|
|
|
|
Title: "create an unrelated pr",
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
session.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now this PR could be marked conflict - or at least a race may occur - so drop down to pure code at this point...
|
|
|
|
gitRepo, err := git.OpenRepository(git.DefaultContext, path)
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
pr := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.PullRequest{
|
|
|
|
HeadRepoID: repo1.ID,
|
|
|
|
BaseRepoID: repo1.ID,
|
|
|
|
HeadBranch: "unrelated",
|
|
|
|
BaseBranch: "base",
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = pull.Merge(context.Background(), pr, user1, gitRepo, repo_model.MergeStyleMerge, "", "UNRELATED", false)
|
|
|
|
assert.Error(t, err, "Merge should return an error due to unrelated")
|
|
|
|
assert.True(t, models.IsErrMergeUnrelatedHistories(err), "Merge error is not a unrelated histories error")
|
|
|
|
gitRepo.Close()
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestConflictChecking(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
onGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, giteaURL *url.URL) {
|
|
|
|
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create new clean repo to test conflict checking.
|
|
|
|
baseRepo, err := repo_service.CreateRepository(db.DefaultContext, user, user, repo_module.CreateRepoOptions{
|
|
|
|
Name: "conflict-checking",
|
|
|
|
Description: "Tempo repo",
|
|
|
|
AutoInit: true,
|
|
|
|
Readme: "Default",
|
|
|
|
DefaultBranch: "main",
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotEmpty(t, baseRepo)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// create a commit on new branch.
|
|
|
|
_, err = files_service.ChangeRepoFiles(git.DefaultContext, baseRepo, user, &files_service.ChangeRepoFilesOptions{
|
|
|
|
Files: []*files_service.ChangeRepoFile{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Operation: "create",
|
|
|
|
TreePath: "important_file",
|
|
|
|
Content: "Just a non-important file",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Message: "Add a important file",
|
|
|
|
OldBranch: "main",
|
|
|
|
NewBranch: "important-secrets",
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// create a commit on main branch.
|
|
|
|
_, err = files_service.ChangeRepoFiles(git.DefaultContext, baseRepo, user, &files_service.ChangeRepoFilesOptions{
|
|
|
|
Files: []*files_service.ChangeRepoFile{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Operation: "create",
|
|
|
|
TreePath: "important_file",
|
|
|
|
Content: "Not the same content :P",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Message: "Add a important file",
|
|
|
|
OldBranch: "main",
|
|
|
|
NewBranch: "main",
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// create Pull to merge the important-secrets branch into main branch.
|
|
|
|
pullIssue := &issues_model.Issue{
|
|
|
|
RepoID: baseRepo.ID,
|
|
|
|
Title: "PR with conflict!",
|
|
|
|
PosterID: user.ID,
|
|
|
|
Poster: user,
|
|
|
|
IsPull: true,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pullRequest := &issues_model.PullRequest{
|
|
|
|
HeadRepoID: baseRepo.ID,
|
|
|
|
BaseRepoID: baseRepo.ID,
|
|
|
|
HeadBranch: "important-secrets",
|
|
|
|
BaseBranch: "main",
|
|
|
|
HeadRepo: baseRepo,
|
|
|
|
BaseRepo: baseRepo,
|
|
|
|
Type: issues_model.PullRequestGitea,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
err = pull.NewPullRequest(git.DefaultContext, baseRepo, pullIssue, nil, nil, pullRequest, nil)
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{Title: "PR with conflict!"})
|
|
|
|
conflictingPR, err := issues_model.GetPullRequestByIssueID(db.DefaultContext, issue.ID)
|
|
|
|
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Ensure conflictedFiles is populated.
|
|
|
|
assert.Len(t, conflictingPR.ConflictedFiles, 1)
|
|
|
|
// Check if status is correct.
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, issues_model.PullRequestStatusConflict, conflictingPR.Status)
|
|
|
|
// Ensure that mergeable returns false
|
|
|
|
assert.False(t, conflictingPR.Mergeable())
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|