Branch protection: Possibility to not use whitelist but allow anyone with write access (#9055)

* Possibility to not use whitelist but allow anyone with write access

* fix existing test

* rename migration function

* Try to give a better name for migration step

* Clear settings if higher level setting is not set

* Move official reviews to db instead of counting approvals each time

* migration

* fix

* fix migration

* fix migration

* Remove NOT NULL from EnableWhitelist as migration isn't possible

* Fix migration, reviews are connected to issues.

* Fix SQL query issues in GetReviewersByPullID.

* Simplify function GetReviewersByIssueID

* Handle reviewers that has been deleted

* Ensure reviews for test is in a well defined order

* Only clear and set official reviews when it is an approve or reject.
pull/9051/head^2
David Svantesson 5 years ago committed by techknowlogick
parent 6460284085
commit bac4b78e09
  1. 1
      integrations/git_test.go
  2. 82
      models/branches.go
  3. 20
      models/fixtures/review.yml
  4. 2
      models/migrations/migrations.go
  5. 87
      models/migrations/v111.go
  6. 6
      models/org_team.go
  7. 8
      models/pull.go
  8. 130
      models/review.go
  9. 39
      models/review_test.go
  10. 27
      modules/auth/repo_form.go
  11. 14
      options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
  12. 2
      public/js/index.js
  13. 2
      public/js/index.js.map
  14. 2
      routers/private/hook.go
  15. 4
      routers/repo/issue.go
  16. 59
      routers/repo/setting_protected_branch.go
  17. 1
      services/pull/review.go
  18. 12
      templates/repo/issue/view_content/pull.tmpl
  19. 57
      templates/repo/settings/protected_branch.tmpl
  20. 5
      web_src/js/index.js

@ -383,6 +383,7 @@ func doProtectBranch(ctx APITestContext, branch string, userToWhitelist string)
req := NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", fmt.Sprintf("/%s/%s/settings/branches/%s", url.PathEscape(ctx.Username), url.PathEscape(ctx.Reponame), url.PathEscape(branch)), map[string]string{
"_csrf": csrf,
"protected": "on",
"enable_push": "whitelist",
"enable_whitelist": "on",
"whitelist_users": strconv.FormatInt(user.ID, 10),
})

@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ type ProtectedBranch struct {
MergeWhitelistTeamIDs []int64 `xorm:"JSON TEXT"`
EnableStatusCheck bool `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT false"`
StatusCheckContexts []string `xorm:"JSON TEXT"`
EnableApprovalsWhitelist bool `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT false"`
ApprovalsWhitelistUserIDs []int64 `xorm:"JSON TEXT"`
ApprovalsWhitelistTeamIDs []int64 `xorm:"JSON TEXT"`
RequiredApprovals int64 `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT 0"`
@ -53,10 +54,25 @@ func (protectBranch *ProtectedBranch) IsProtected() bool {
// CanUserPush returns if some user could push to this protected branch
func (protectBranch *ProtectedBranch) CanUserPush(userID int64) bool {
if !protectBranch.EnableWhitelist {
if !protectBranch.CanPush {
return false
}
if !protectBranch.EnableWhitelist {
if user, err := GetUserByID(userID); err != nil {
log.Error("GetUserByID: %v", err)
return false
} else if repo, err := GetRepositoryByID(protectBranch.RepoID); err != nil {
log.Error("GetRepositoryByID: %v", err)
return false
} else if writeAccess, err := HasAccessUnit(user, repo, UnitTypeCode, AccessModeWrite); err != nil {
log.Error("HasAccessUnit: %v", err)
return false
} else {
return writeAccess
}
}
if base.Int64sContains(protectBranch.WhitelistUserIDs, userID) {
return true
}
@ -95,6 +111,38 @@ func (protectBranch *ProtectedBranch) CanUserMerge(userID int64) bool {
return in
}
// IsUserOfficialReviewer check if user is official reviewer for the branch (counts towards required approvals)
func (protectBranch *ProtectedBranch) IsUserOfficialReviewer(user *User) (bool, error) {
return protectBranch.isUserOfficialReviewer(x, user)
}
func (protectBranch *ProtectedBranch) isUserOfficialReviewer(e Engine, user *User) (bool, error) {
repo, err := getRepositoryByID(e, protectBranch.RepoID)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
if !protectBranch.EnableApprovalsWhitelist {
// Anyone with write access is considered official reviewer
writeAccess, err := hasAccessUnit(e, user, repo, UnitTypeCode, AccessModeWrite)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
return writeAccess, nil
}
if base.Int64sContains(protectBranch.ApprovalsWhitelistUserIDs, user.ID) {
return true, nil
}
inTeam, err := isUserInTeams(e, user.ID, protectBranch.ApprovalsWhitelistTeamIDs)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
return inTeam, nil
}
// HasEnoughApprovals returns true if pr has enough granted approvals.
func (protectBranch *ProtectedBranch) HasEnoughApprovals(pr *PullRequest) bool {
if protectBranch.RequiredApprovals == 0 {
@ -105,30 +153,16 @@ func (protectBranch *ProtectedBranch) HasEnoughApprovals(pr *PullRequest) bool {
// GetGrantedApprovalsCount returns the number of granted approvals for pr. A granted approval must be authored by a user in an approval whitelist.
func (protectBranch *ProtectedBranch) GetGrantedApprovalsCount(pr *PullRequest) int64 {
reviews, err := GetReviewersByPullID(pr.IssueID)
approvals, err := x.Where("issue_id = ?", pr.Issue.ID).
And("type = ?", ReviewTypeApprove).
And("official = ?", true).
Count(new(Review))
if err != nil {
log.Error("GetReviewersByPullID: %v", err)
log.Error("GetGrantedApprovalsCount: %v", err)
return 0
}
approvals := int64(0)
userIDs := make([]int64, 0)
for _, review := range reviews {
if review.Type != ReviewTypeApprove {
continue
}
if base.Int64sContains(protectBranch.ApprovalsWhitelistUserIDs, review.ID) {
approvals++
continue
}
userIDs = append(userIDs, review.ID)
}
approvalTeamCount, err := UsersInTeamsCount(userIDs, protectBranch.ApprovalsWhitelistTeamIDs)
if err != nil {
log.Error("UsersInTeamsCount: %v", err)
return 0
}
return approvalTeamCount + approvals
return approvals
}
// GetProtectedBranchByRepoID getting protected branch by repo ID
@ -139,8 +173,12 @@ func GetProtectedBranchByRepoID(repoID int64) ([]*ProtectedBranch, error) {
// GetProtectedBranchBy getting protected branch by ID/Name
func GetProtectedBranchBy(repoID int64, branchName string) (*ProtectedBranch, error) {
return getProtectedBranchBy(x, repoID, branchName)
}
func getProtectedBranchBy(e Engine, repoID int64, branchName string) (*ProtectedBranch, error) {
rel := &ProtectedBranch{RepoID: repoID, BranchName: branchName}
has, err := x.Get(rel)
has, err := e.Get(rel)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}

@ -44,32 +44,32 @@
reviewer_id: 2
issue_id: 3
content: "New review 3"
updated_unix: 946684810
created_unix: 946684810
updated_unix: 946684811
created_unix: 946684811
-
id: 7
type: 3
reviewer_id: 3
issue_id: 3
content: "New review 4"
updated_unix: 946684810
created_unix: 946684810
updated_unix: 946684812
created_unix: 946684812
-
id: 8
type: 1
reviewer_id: 4
issue_id: 3
content: "New review 5"
updated_unix: 946684810
created_unix: 946684810
updated_unix: 946684813
created_unix: 946684813
-
id: 9
type: 3
reviewer_id: 2
issue_id: 3
content: "New review 3 rejected"
updated_unix: 946684810
created_unix: 946684810
updated_unix: 946684814
created_unix: 946684814
-
id: 10
@ -77,5 +77,5 @@
reviewer_id: 100
issue_id: 3
content: "a deleted user's review"
updated_unix: 946684810
created_unix: 946684810
updated_unix: 946684815
created_unix: 946684815

@ -276,6 +276,8 @@ var migrations = []Migration{
NewMigration("add can_create_org_repo to team", addCanCreateOrgRepoColumnForTeam),
// v110 -> v111
NewMigration("change review content type to text", changeReviewContentToText),
// v111 -> v112
NewMigration("update branch protection for can push and whitelist enable", addBranchProtectionCanPushAndEnableWhitelist),
}
// Migrate database to current version

@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
// Copyright 2019 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a MIT-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
package migrations
import (
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models"
"xorm.io/xorm"
)
func addBranchProtectionCanPushAndEnableWhitelist(x *xorm.Engine) error {
type ProtectedBranch struct {
CanPush bool `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT false"`
EnableApprovalsWhitelist bool `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT false"`
RequiredApprovals int64 `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT 0"`
}
type Review struct {
ID int64 `xorm:"pk autoincr"`
Official bool `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT false"`
}
sess := x.NewSession()
defer sess.Close()
if err := sess.Sync2(new(ProtectedBranch)); err != nil {
return err
}
if err := sess.Sync2(new(Review)); err != nil {
return err
}
if _, err := sess.Exec("UPDATE `protected_branch` SET `can_push` = `enable_whitelist`"); err != nil {
return err
}
if _, err := sess.Exec("UPDATE `protected_branch` SET `enable_approvals_whitelist` = ? WHERE `required_approvals` > ?", true, 0); err != nil {
return err
}
var pageSize int64 = 20
qresult, err := sess.QueryInterface("SELECT max(id) as max_id FROM issue")
if err != nil {
return err
}
var totalIssues int64
totalIssues, ok := qresult[0]["max_id"].(int64)
if !ok {
// If there are no issues at all we ignore it
return nil
}
totalPages := totalIssues / pageSize
// Find latest review of each user in each pull request, and set official field if appropriate
reviews := []*models.Review{}
var page int64
for page = 0; page <= totalPages; page++ {
if err := sess.SQL("SELECT * FROM review WHERE id IN (SELECT max(id) as id FROM review WHERE issue_id > ? AND issue_id <= ? AND type in (?, ?) GROUP BY issue_id, reviewer_id)",
page*pageSize, (page+1)*pageSize, models.ReviewTypeApprove, models.ReviewTypeReject).
Find(&reviews); err != nil {
return err
}
for _, review := range reviews {
if err := review.LoadAttributes(); err != nil {
// Error might occur if user or issue doesn't exist, ignore it.
continue
}
official, err := models.IsOfficialReviewer(review.Issue, review.Reviewer)
if err != nil {
// Branch might not be proteced or other error, ignore it.
continue
}
review.Official = official
if _, err := sess.ID(review.ID).Cols("official").Update(review); err != nil {
return err
}
}
}
return sess.Commit()
}

@ -914,7 +914,11 @@ func RemoveTeamMember(team *Team, userID int64) error {
// IsUserInTeams returns if a user in some teams
func IsUserInTeams(userID int64, teamIDs []int64) (bool, error) {
return x.Where("uid=?", userID).In("team_id", teamIDs).Exist(new(TeamUser))
return isUserInTeams(x, userID, teamIDs)
}
func isUserInTeams(e Engine, userID int64, teamIDs []int64) (bool, error) {
return e.Where("uid=?", userID).In("team_id", teamIDs).Exist(new(TeamUser))
}
// UsersInTeamsCount counts the number of users which are in userIDs and teamIDs

@ -159,16 +159,20 @@ func (pr *PullRequest) loadIssue(e Engine) (err error) {
// LoadProtectedBranch loads the protected branch of the base branch
func (pr *PullRequest) LoadProtectedBranch() (err error) {
return pr.loadProtectedBranch(x)
}
func (pr *PullRequest) loadProtectedBranch(e Engine) (err error) {
if pr.BaseRepo == nil {
if pr.BaseRepoID == 0 {
return nil
}
pr.BaseRepo, err = GetRepositoryByID(pr.BaseRepoID)
pr.BaseRepo, err = getRepositoryByID(e, pr.BaseRepoID)
if err != nil {
return
}
}
pr.ProtectedBranch, err = GetProtectedBranchBy(pr.BaseRepo.ID, pr.BaseBranch)
pr.ProtectedBranch, err = getProtectedBranchBy(e, pr.BaseRepo.ID, pr.BaseBranch)
return
}

@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ import (
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/timeutil"
"xorm.io/builder"
"xorm.io/core"
)
// ReviewType defines the sort of feedback a review gives
@ -53,6 +52,8 @@ type Review struct {
Issue *Issue `xorm:"-"`
IssueID int64 `xorm:"index"`
Content string `xorm:"TEXT"`
// Official is a review made by an assigned approver (counts towards approval)
Official bool `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT false"`
CreatedUnix timeutil.TimeStamp `xorm:"INDEX created"`
UpdatedUnix timeutil.TimeStamp `xorm:"INDEX updated"`
@ -122,23 +123,6 @@ func GetReviewByID(id int64) (*Review, error) {
return getReviewByID(x, id)
}
func getUniqueApprovalsByPullRequestID(e Engine, prID int64) (reviews []*Review, err error) {
reviews = make([]*Review, 0)
if err := e.
Where("issue_id = ? AND type = ?", prID, ReviewTypeApprove).
OrderBy("updated_unix").
GroupBy("reviewer_id").
Find(&reviews); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return
}
// GetUniqueApprovalsByPullRequestID returns all reviews submitted for a specific pull request
func GetUniqueApprovalsByPullRequestID(prID int64) ([]*Review, error) {
return getUniqueApprovalsByPullRequestID(x, prID)
}
// FindReviewOptions represent possible filters to find reviews
type FindReviewOptions struct {
Type ReviewType
@ -180,6 +164,27 @@ type CreateReviewOptions struct {
Type ReviewType
Issue *Issue
Reviewer *User
Official bool
}
// IsOfficialReviewer check if reviewer can make official reviews in issue (counts towards required approvals)
func IsOfficialReviewer(issue *Issue, reviewer *User) (bool, error) {
return isOfficialReviewer(x, issue, reviewer)
}
func isOfficialReviewer(e Engine, issue *Issue, reviewer *User) (bool, error) {
pr, err := getPullRequestByIssueID(e, issue.ID)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
if err = pr.loadProtectedBranch(e); err != nil {
return false, err
}
if pr.ProtectedBranch == nil {
return false, nil
}
return pr.ProtectedBranch.isUserOfficialReviewer(e, reviewer)
}
func createReview(e Engine, opts CreateReviewOptions) (*Review, error) {
@ -190,6 +195,7 @@ func createReview(e Engine, opts CreateReviewOptions) (*Review, error) {
Reviewer: opts.Reviewer,
ReviewerID: opts.Reviewer.ID,
Content: opts.Content,
Official: opts.Official,
}
if _, err := e.Insert(review); err != nil {
return nil, err
@ -255,6 +261,8 @@ func SubmitReview(doer *User, issue *Issue, reviewType ReviewType, content strin
return nil, nil, err
}
var official = false
review, err := getCurrentReview(sess, doer, issue)
if err != nil {
if !IsErrReviewNotExist(err) {
@ -265,12 +273,24 @@ func SubmitReview(doer *User, issue *Issue, reviewType ReviewType, content strin
return nil, nil, ContentEmptyErr{}
}
if reviewType == ReviewTypeApprove || reviewType == ReviewTypeReject {
// Only reviewers latest review of type approve and reject shall count as "official", so existing reviews needs to be cleared
if _, err := sess.Exec("UPDATE `review` SET official=? WHERE issue_id=? AND reviewer_id=?", false, issue.ID, doer.ID); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
official, err = isOfficialReviewer(sess, issue, doer)
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
}
// No current review. Create a new one!
review, err = createReview(sess, CreateReviewOptions{
Type: reviewType,
Issue: issue,
Reviewer: doer,
Content: content,
Official: official,
})
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
@ -283,10 +303,23 @@ func SubmitReview(doer *User, issue *Issue, reviewType ReviewType, content strin
return nil, nil, ContentEmptyErr{}
}
if reviewType == ReviewTypeApprove || reviewType == ReviewTypeReject {
// Only reviewers latest review of type approve and reject shall count as "official", so existing reviews needs to be cleared
if _, err := sess.Exec("UPDATE `review` SET official=? WHERE issue_id=? AND reviewer_id=?", false, issue.ID, doer.ID); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
official, err = isOfficialReviewer(sess, issue, doer)
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
}
review.Official = official
review.Issue = issue
review.Content = content
review.Type = reviewType
if _, err := sess.ID(review.ID).Cols("content, type").Update(review); err != nil {
if _, err := sess.ID(review.ID).Cols("content, type, official").Update(review); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
}
@ -307,46 +340,33 @@ func SubmitReview(doer *User, issue *Issue, reviewType ReviewType, content strin
return review, comm, sess.Commit()
}
// PullReviewersWithType represents the type used to display a review overview
type PullReviewersWithType struct {
User `xorm:"extends"`
Type ReviewType
ReviewUpdatedUnix timeutil.TimeStamp `xorm:"review_updated_unix"`
}
// GetReviewersByIssueID gets the latest review of each reviewer for a pull request
func GetReviewersByIssueID(issueID int64) (reviews []*Review, err error) {
reviewsUnfiltered := []*Review{}
// GetReviewersByPullID gets all reviewers for a pull request with the statuses
func GetReviewersByPullID(pullID int64) (issueReviewers []*PullReviewersWithType, err error) {
irs := []*PullReviewersWithType{}
if x.Dialect().DBType() == core.MSSQL {
err = x.SQL(`SELECT [user].*, review.type, review.review_updated_unix FROM
(SELECT review.id, review.type, review.reviewer_id, max(review.updated_unix) as review_updated_unix
FROM review WHERE review.issue_id=? AND (review.type = ? OR review.type = ?)
GROUP BY review.id, review.type, review.reviewer_id) as review
INNER JOIN [user] ON review.reviewer_id = [user].id ORDER BY review_updated_unix DESC`,
pullID, ReviewTypeApprove, ReviewTypeReject).
Find(&irs)
} else {
err = x.Select("`user`.*, review.type, max(review.updated_unix) as review_updated_unix").
Table("review").
Join("INNER", "`user`", "review.reviewer_id = `user`.id").
Where("review.issue_id = ? AND (review.type = ? OR review.type = ?)",
pullID, ReviewTypeApprove, ReviewTypeReject).
GroupBy("`user`.id, review.type").
OrderBy("review_updated_unix DESC").
Find(&irs)
sess := x.NewSession()
defer sess.Close()
if err := sess.Begin(); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
// We need to group our results by user id _and_ review type, otherwise the query fails when using postgresql.
// But becaus we're doing this, we need to manually filter out multiple reviews of different types by the
// same person because we only want to show the newest review grouped by user. Thats why we're using a map here.
issueReviewers = []*PullReviewersWithType{}
usersInArray := make(map[int64]bool)
for _, ir := range irs {
if !usersInArray[ir.ID] {
issueReviewers = append(issueReviewers, ir)
usersInArray[ir.ID] = true
// Get latest review of each reviwer, sorted in order they were made
if err := sess.SQL("SELECT * FROM review WHERE id IN (SELECT max(id) as id FROM review WHERE issue_id = ? AND type in (?, ?) GROUP BY issue_id, reviewer_id) ORDER BY review.updated_unix ASC",
issueID, ReviewTypeApprove, ReviewTypeReject).
Find(&reviewsUnfiltered); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
// Load reviewer and skip if user is deleted
for _, review := range reviewsUnfiltered {
if err := review.loadReviewer(sess); err != nil {
if !IsErrUserNotExist(err) {
return nil, err
}
} else {
reviews = append(reviews, review)
}
}
return
return reviews, nil
}

@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ func TestCreateReview(t *testing.T) {
AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &Review{Content: "New Review"})
}
func TestGetReviewersByPullID(t *testing.T) {
func TestGetReviewersByIssueID(t *testing.T) {
assert.NoError(t, PrepareTestDatabase())
issue := AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &Issue{ID: 3}).(*Issue)
@ -106,24 +106,29 @@ func TestGetReviewersByPullID(t *testing.T) {
user3 := AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &User{ID: 3}).(*User)
user4 := AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &User{ID: 4}).(*User)
expectedReviews := []*PullReviewersWithType{}
expectedReviews = append(expectedReviews, &PullReviewersWithType{
User: *user2,
Type: ReviewTypeReject,
ReviewUpdatedUnix: 946684810,
},
&PullReviewersWithType{
User: *user3,
Type: ReviewTypeReject,
ReviewUpdatedUnix: 946684810,
expectedReviews := []*Review{}
expectedReviews = append(expectedReviews,
&Review{
Reviewer: user3,
Type: ReviewTypeReject,
UpdatedUnix: 946684812,
},
&PullReviewersWithType{
User: *user4,
Type: ReviewTypeApprove,
ReviewUpdatedUnix: 946684810,
&Review{
Reviewer: user4,
Type: ReviewTypeApprove,
UpdatedUnix: 946684813,
},
&Review{
Reviewer: user2,
Type: ReviewTypeReject,
UpdatedUnix: 946684814,
})
allReviews, err := GetReviewersByPullID(issue.ID)
allReviews, err := GetReviewersByIssueID(issue.ID)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.Equal(t, expectedReviews, allReviews)
for i, review := range allReviews {
assert.Equal(t, expectedReviews[i].Reviewer, review.Reviewer)
assert.Equal(t, expectedReviews[i].Type, review.Type)
assert.Equal(t, expectedReviews[i].UpdatedUnix, review.UpdatedUnix)
}
}

@ -157,19 +157,20 @@ func (f *RepoSettingForm) Validate(ctx *macaron.Context, errs binding.Errors) bi
// ProtectBranchForm form for changing protected branch settings
type ProtectBranchForm struct {
Protected bool
EnableWhitelist bool
WhitelistUsers string
WhitelistTeams string
WhitelistDeployKeys bool
EnableMergeWhitelist bool
MergeWhitelistUsers string
MergeWhitelistTeams string
EnableStatusCheck bool `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT false"`
StatusCheckContexts []string
RequiredApprovals int64
ApprovalsWhitelistUsers string
ApprovalsWhitelistTeams string
Protected bool
EnablePush string
WhitelistUsers string
WhitelistTeams string
WhitelistDeployKeys bool
EnableMergeWhitelist bool
MergeWhitelistUsers string
MergeWhitelistTeams string
EnableStatusCheck bool `xorm:"NOT NULL DEFAULT false"`
StatusCheckContexts []string
RequiredApprovals int64
EnableApprovalsWhitelist bool
ApprovalsWhitelistUsers string
ApprovalsWhitelistTeams string
}
// Validate validates the fields

@ -1382,9 +1382,13 @@ settings.protected_branch_can_push_yes = You can push
settings.protected_branch_can_push_no = You can not push
settings.branch_protection = Branch Protection for Branch '<b>%s</b>'
settings.protect_this_branch = Enable Branch Protection
settings.protect_this_branch_desc = Prevent deletion and disable any Git pushing to the branch.
settings.protect_whitelist_committers = Enable Push Whitelist
settings.protect_whitelist_committers_desc = Allow whitelisted users or teams to push to this branch (but not force push).
settings.protect_this_branch_desc = Prevents deletion and restricts Git pushing and merging to the branch.
settings.protect_disable_push = Disable Push
settings.protect_disable_push_desc = No pushing will be allowed to this branch.
settings.protect_enable_push = Enable Push
settings.protect_enable_push_desc = Anyone with write access will be allowed to push to this branch (but not force push).
settings.protect_whitelist_committers = Whitelist Restricted Push
settings.protect_whitelist_committers_desc = Only whitelisted users or teams will be allowed to push to this branch (but not force push).
settings.protect_whitelist_deploy_keys = Whitelist deploy keys with write access to push
settings.protect_whitelist_users = Whitelisted users for pushing:
settings.protect_whitelist_search_users = Search users…
@ -1398,7 +1402,9 @@ settings.protect_check_status_contexts = Enable Status Check
settings.protect_check_status_contexts_desc = Require status checks to pass before merging Choose which status checks must pass before branches can be merged into a branch that matches this rule. When enabled, commits must first be pushed to another branch, then merged or pushed directly to a branch that matches this rule after status checks have passed. If no contexts are selected, the last commit must be successful regardless of context.
settings.protect_check_status_contexts_list = Status checks found in the last week for this repository
settings.protect_required_approvals = Required approvals:
settings.protect_required_approvals_desc = Allow only to merge pull request with enough positive reviews of whitelisted users or teams.
settings.protect_required_approvals_desc = Allow only to merge pull request with enough positive reviews.
settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_enabled = Restrict approvals to whitelisted users or teams
settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_enabled_desc = Only reviews from whitelisted users or teams will count to the required approvals. Without approval whitelist, reviews from anyone with write access count to the required approvals.
settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_users = Whitelisted reviewers:
settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_teams = Whitelisted teams for reviews:
settings.add_protected_branch = Enable protection

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ func HookPreReceive(ctx *macaron.Context) {
canPush := false
if isDeployKey {
canPush = protectBranch.WhitelistDeployKeys
canPush = protectBranch.CanPush && (!protectBranch.EnableWhitelist || protectBranch.WhitelistDeployKeys)
} else {
canPush = protectBranch.CanUserPush(userID)
}

@ -935,9 +935,9 @@ func ViewIssue(ctx *context.Context) {
}
ctx.Data["IsPullBranchDeletable"] = canDelete && pull.HeadRepo != nil && git.IsBranchExist(pull.HeadRepo.RepoPath(), pull.HeadBranch)
ctx.Data["PullReviewersWithType"], err = models.GetReviewersByPullID(issue.ID)
ctx.Data["PullReviewers"], err = models.GetReviewersByIssueID(issue.ID)
if err != nil {
ctx.ServerError("GetReviewersByPullID", err)
ctx.ServerError("GetReviewersByIssueID", err)
return
}
}

@ -196,32 +196,55 @@ func SettingsProtectedBranchPost(ctx *context.Context, f auth.ProtectBranchForm)
}
var whitelistUsers, whitelistTeams, mergeWhitelistUsers, mergeWhitelistTeams, approvalsWhitelistUsers, approvalsWhitelistTeams []int64
protectBranch.EnableWhitelist = f.EnableWhitelist
if strings.TrimSpace(f.WhitelistUsers) != "" {
whitelistUsers, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.WhitelistUsers, ","))
}
if strings.TrimSpace(f.WhitelistTeams) != "" {
whitelistTeams, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.WhitelistTeams, ","))
switch f.EnablePush {
case "all":
protectBranch.CanPush = true
protectBranch.EnableWhitelist = false
protectBranch.WhitelistDeployKeys = false
case "whitelist":
protectBranch.CanPush = true
protectBranch.EnableWhitelist = true
protectBranch.WhitelistDeployKeys = f.WhitelistDeployKeys
if strings.TrimSpace(f.WhitelistUsers) != "" {
whitelistUsers, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.WhitelistUsers, ","))
}
if strings.TrimSpace(f.WhitelistTeams) != "" {
whitelistTeams, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.WhitelistTeams, ","))
}
default:
protectBranch.CanPush = false
protectBranch.EnableWhitelist = false
protectBranch.WhitelistDeployKeys = false
}
protectBranch.EnableMergeWhitelist = f.EnableMergeWhitelist
if strings.TrimSpace(f.MergeWhitelistUsers) != "" {
mergeWhitelistUsers, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.MergeWhitelistUsers, ","))
}
if strings.TrimSpace(f.MergeWhitelistTeams) != "" {
mergeWhitelistTeams, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.MergeWhitelistTeams, ","))
if f.EnableMergeWhitelist {
if strings.TrimSpace(f.MergeWhitelistUsers) != "" {
mergeWhitelistUsers, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.MergeWhitelistUsers, ","))
}
if strings.TrimSpace(f.MergeWhitelistTeams) != "" {
mergeWhitelistTeams, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.MergeWhitelistTeams, ","))
}
}
protectBranch.EnableStatusCheck = f.EnableStatusCheck
protectBranch.StatusCheckContexts = f.StatusCheckContexts
protectBranch.WhitelistDeployKeys = f.WhitelistDeployKeys
if f.EnableStatusCheck {
protectBranch.StatusCheckContexts = f.StatusCheckContexts
} else {
protectBranch.StatusCheckContexts = nil
}
protectBranch.RequiredApprovals = f.RequiredApprovals
if strings.TrimSpace(f.ApprovalsWhitelistUsers) != "" {
approvalsWhitelistUsers, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.ApprovalsWhitelistUsers, ","))
}
if strings.TrimSpace(f.ApprovalsWhitelistTeams) != "" {
approvalsWhitelistTeams, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.ApprovalsWhitelistTeams, ","))
protectBranch.EnableApprovalsWhitelist = f.EnableApprovalsWhitelist
if f.EnableApprovalsWhitelist {
if strings.TrimSpace(f.ApprovalsWhitelistUsers) != "" {
approvalsWhitelistUsers, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.ApprovalsWhitelistUsers, ","))
}
if strings.TrimSpace(f.ApprovalsWhitelistTeams) != "" {
approvalsWhitelistTeams, _ = base.StringsToInt64s(strings.Split(f.ApprovalsWhitelistTeams, ","))
}
}
err = models.UpdateProtectBranch(ctx.Repo.Repository, protectBranch, models.WhitelistOptions{
UserIDs: whitelistUsers,
TeamIDs: whitelistTeams,

@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ func CreateCodeComment(doer *models.User, issue *models.Issue, line int64, conte
Type: models.ReviewTypePending,
Reviewer: doer,
Issue: issue,
Official: false,
})
if err != nil {
return nil, err

@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
{{if gt (len .PullReviewersWithType) 0}}
{{if gt (len .PullReviewers) 0}}
<div class="comment box">
<div class="content">
<div class="ui segment">
<h4>{{$.i18n.Tr "repo.issues.review.reviewers"}}</h4>
{{range .PullReviewersWithType}}
{{ $createdStr:= TimeSinceUnix .ReviewUpdatedUnix $.Lang }}
{{range .PullReviewers}}
{{ $createdStr:= TimeSinceUnix .UpdatedUnix $.Lang }}
<div class="ui divider"></div>
<div class="review-item">
<span class="type-icon text {{if eq .Type 1}}green
@ -13,10 +13,10 @@
{{else}}grey{{end}}">
<span class="octicon octicon-{{.Type.Icon}}"></span>
</span>
<a class="ui avatar image" href="{{.HomeLink}}">
<img src="{{.RelAvatarLink}}">
<a class="ui avatar image" href="{{.Reviewer.HomeLink}}">
<img src="{{.Reviewer.RelAvatarLink}}">
</a>
<span class="text grey"><a href="{{.HomeLink}}">{{.Name}}</a>
<span class="text grey"><a href="{{.Reviewer.HomeLink}}">{{.Reviewer.Name}}</a>
{{if eq .Type 1}}
{{$.i18n.Tr "repo.issues.review.approve" $createdStr | Safe}}
{{else if eq .Type 2}}

@ -19,8 +19,22 @@
</div>
<div id="protection_box" class="fields {{if not .Branch.IsProtected}}disabled{{end}}">
<div class="field">
<div class="ui checkbox">
<input class="enable-whitelist" name="enable_whitelist" type="checkbox" data-target="#whitelist_box" {{if .Branch.EnableWhitelist}}checked{{end}}>
<div class="ui radio checkbox">
<input name="enable_push" type="radio" value="none" class="disable-whitelist" data-target="#whitelist_box" {{if not .Branch.CanPush}}checked{{end}}>
<label>{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_disable_push"}}</label>
<p class="help">{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_disable_push_desc"}}</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="field">
<div class="ui radio checkbox">
<input name="enable_push" type="radio" value="all" class="disable-whitelist" data-target="#whitelist_box" {{if and (.Branch.CanPush) (not .Branch.EnableWhitelist)}}checked{{end}}>
<label>{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_enable_push"}}</label>
<p class="help">{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_enable_push_desc"}}</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="field">
<div class="ui radio checkbox">
<input name="enable_push" type="radio" value="whitelist" class="enable-whitelist" data-target="#whitelist_box" {{if and (.Branch.CanPush) (.Branch.EnableWhitelist)}}checked{{end}}>
<label>{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_whitelist_committers"}}</label>
<p class="help">{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_whitelist_committers_desc"}}</p>
</div>
@ -148,7 +162,14 @@
<input name="required_approvals" id="required-approvals" type="number" value="{{.Branch.RequiredApprovals}}">
<p class="help">{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_required_approvals_desc"}}</p>
</div>
<div class="fields">
<div class="field">
<div class="ui checkbox">
<input class="enable-whitelist" name="enable_approvals_whitelist" type="checkbox" data-target="#approvals_whitelist_box" {{if .Branch.EnableApprovalsWhitelist}}checked{{end}}>
<label>{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_enabled"}}</label>
<p class="help">{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_enabled_desc"}}</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="approvals_whitelist_box" class="fields {{if not .Branch.EnableApprovalsWhitelist}}disabled{{end}}">
<div class="whitelist field">
<label>{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_users"}}</label>
<div class="ui multiple search selection dropdown">
@ -164,24 +185,24 @@
</div>
</div>
</div>
{{if .Owner.IsOrganization}}
<br>
<div class="whitelist field">
<label>{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_teams"}}</label>
<div class="ui multiple search selection dropdown">
<input type="hidden" name="approvals_whitelist_teams" value="{{.approvals_whitelist_teams}}">
<div class="default text">{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_whitelist_search_teams"}}</div>
<div class="menu">
{{range .Teams}}
<div class="item" data-value="{{.ID}}">
<i class="octicon octicon-jersey"></i>
{{.Name}}
{{if .Owner.IsOrganization}}
<br>
<div class="whitelist field">
<label>{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_approvals_whitelist_teams"}}</label>
<div class="ui multiple search selection dropdown">
<input type="hidden" name="approvals_whitelist_teams" value="{{.approvals_whitelist_teams}}">
<div class="default text">{{.i18n.Tr "repo.settings.protect_whitelist_search_teams"}}</div>
<div class="menu">
{{range .Teams}}
<div class="item" data-value="{{.ID}}">
<i class="octicon octicon-jersey"></i>
{{.Name}}
</div>
{{end}}
</div>
{{end}}
</div>
</div>
</div>
{{end}}
{{end}}
</div>
</div>

@ -1043,6 +1043,11 @@ function initRepository() {
$($(this).data('target')).addClass('disabled');
}
});
$('.disable-whitelist').change(function () {
if (this.checked) {
$($(this).data('target')).addClass('disabled');
}
});
}
}

Loading…
Cancel
Save