3 Commits (099052aba5bfa3a0a700d88d2e2891ae99f151ce)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
silverwind	9a3de436f4	Reorder blocks in vue SFCs (#26874) ... The [recommended order](https://vuejs.org/guide/scaling-up/sfc.html) for SFC blocks is script -> template -> style, which we were violating because template and script were swapped. I do find script first also easier to read because the imports are on top, letting me immideatly see a component's dependencies. This is a pure cut-paste refactor with some removal of some empty lines. --------- Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>	1 year ago
Jonathan Tran	a583c56306	Change access token UI to select dropdowns (#25109) ... The current UI to create API access tokens uses checkboxes that have a complicated relationship where some need to be checked and/or disabled in certain states. It also requires that a user interact with it to understand what their options really are. This branch changes to use `<select>`s. It better fits the available options, and it's closer to [GitHub's UI](https://github.com/settings/personal-access-tokens/new), which is good, in my opinion. It's more mobile friendly since the tap-areas are larger. If we ever add more permissions, like Maintainer, there's a natural place that doesn't take up more screen real-estate. This branch also fixes a few minor issues: - Hide the error about selecting at least one permission after second submission - Fix help description to call it "authorization" since that's what permissions are about (not authentication) Related: #24767. <img width="883" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-07 at 5 07 34 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/10803/6b63d807-c9be-4a4b-8e53-ecab6cbb8f76"> --- When it's open: <img width="881" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-07 at 5 07 59 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/10803/2432c6d0-39c2-4ca4-820e-c878ffdbfb69">	1 year ago
Jack Hay	18de83b2a3	Redesign Scoped Access Tokens (#24767) ... ## Changes - Adds the following high level access scopes, each with `read` and `write` levels: - `activitypub` - `admin` (hidden if user is not a site admin) - `misc` - `notification` - `organization` - `package` - `issue` - `repository` - `user` - Adds new middleware function `tokenRequiresScopes()` in addition to `reqToken()` - `tokenRequiresScopes()` is used for each high-level api section - _if_ a scoped token is present, checks that the required scope is included based on the section and HTTP method - `reqToken()` is used for individual routes - checks that required authentication is present (but does not check scope levels as this will already have been handled by `tokenRequiresScopes()` - Adds migration to convert old scoped access tokens to the new set of scopes - Updates the user interface for scope selection ### User interface example <img width="903" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 55 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/654766ec-2143-4f59-9037-3b51600e32f3"> <img width="917" alt="Screen Shot 2023-05-31 at 1 56 43 PM" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/23248839/1ad64081-012c-4a73-b393-66b30352654c"> ## tokenRequiresScopes Design Decision - `tokenRequiresScopes()` was added to more reliably cover api routes. For an incoming request, this function uses the given scope category (say `AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization`) and the HTTP method (say `DELETE`) and verifies that any scoped tokens in use include `delete:organization`. - `reqToken()` is used to enforce auth for individual routes that require it. If a scoped token is not present for a request, `tokenRequiresScopes()` will not return an error ## TODO - [x] Alphabetize scope categories - [x] Change 'public repos only' to a radio button (private vs public). Also expand this to organizations - [X] Disable token creation if no scopes selected. Alternatively, show warning - [x] `reqToken()` is missing from many `POST/DELETE` routes in the api. `tokenRequiresScopes()` only checks that a given token has the correct scope, `reqToken()` must be used to check that a token (or some other auth) is present. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] The migration should be reviewed very carefully in order to minimize access changes to existing user tokens. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - [x] Link to api to swagger documentation, clarify what read/write/delete levels correspond to - [x] Review cases where more than one scope is needed as this directly deviates from the api definition. - _This should be addressed in this PR_ - For example: ```go m.Group("/users/{username}/orgs", func() { m.Get("", reqToken(), org.ListUserOrgs) m.Get("/{org}/permissions", reqToken(), org.GetUserOrgsPermissions) }, tokenRequiresScopes(auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryUser, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeCategoryOrganization), context_service.UserAssignmentAPI()) ``` ## Future improvements - [ ] Add required scopes to swagger documentation - [ ] Redesign `reqToken()` to be opt-out rather than opt-in - [ ] Subdivide scopes like `repository` - [ ] Once a token is created, if it has no scopes, we should display text instead of an empty bullet point - [ ] If the 'public repos only' option is selected, should read categories be selected by default Closes #24501 Closes #24799 Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jon@allspice.io> Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>	1 year ago