gitea

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Jimmy Praet	4d9349123f	label and milestone webhooks on issue/pull creation (#14363 )	4 years ago
Jimmy Praet	e6acce649b	Send notifications for mentions in pulls, issues, (code-)comments (#14218 ) Fixes #14187: mention handling extracted from email notification code Fixes #14013: add notification for mentions in pull request code comments Fixes #13450: Not receiving any emails with setting "Only Email on Mention"	4 years ago
a1012112796	b9850375fc	Add review request api (#11355 ) * Add review request api * add : POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/requested_reviewers * Remove : DELET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/requested_reviewers * fix some request review bug * block delet request review by models/DeleteReview() Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com> * make fmt * fix bug * fix test code * fix typo * Apply suggestion from code review @jonasfranz * fix swagger ref * fix typo Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv> * fix comment * Change response message * chang response so some simplfy * Add ErrIllLegalReviewRequest fix some nits * make fmt * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io> * * Add team support * fix test * fix an known bug * fix nit * fix test * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net> * update get api and add test Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv> Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io> Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>	4 years ago
赵智超	8be3e439c2	Add team support for review request (#12039 ) Add team support for review request Block #11355 Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv> Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>	4 years ago
Vedran	e204398754	Change/remove a branch of an open issue (#9080 ) * Add field with isIssueWriter to front end * Make branch field editable * Switch frontend to form and POST from javascript * Add /issue/id/ref endpoint to routes * Use UpdateIssueTitle model to change ref in backend * Removed crossreference check and adding comments on branch change * Use ref returned from POST to update the field * Prevent calling loadRepo from models/ * Branch/tag refreshed without page reload * Remove filter for empty branch name * Add clear option to tag list as well * Delete button translation and coloring * Fix for not showing selected branch name in new issue * Check that branch is not being changed on a PR * Change logic * Notification when changing issue ref * Fix for renamed permission parameter * Fix for failing build * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: Gitea <gitea@fake.local> Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>	4 years ago
Sijmen Schoon	66a9ef9036	Fix ref links in issue overviews for tags (#8742 ) * Properly generate ref URLs Tags used to not generate correct URLs (src/branch/tags/1.0.0 instead of src/tags/1.0.0). Also cleans up some code around it with the created helper functions. * Fix formatting and create migration * Add copyright head to utils_test * Use a raw query for the ref migration * Remove semicolon * Quote column and table names in migration SQL * Change \|\| to CONCAT, since MSSQL does not support \|\| * Make migration engine aware * Add missing import * Move ref EndName and URL to the issue service * Fix tests * Add test for commit refs * Update issue.go * Use the right command for building JavaScript bundles * Prepare for merge * Check for refs/* before prepending in migration * Update services/issue/issue_test.go * Update modules/git/utils_test.go Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io> Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net>	5 years ago
zeripath	4974b7c120	Fix spelling mistake with Rewiew (#11262 ) Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>	5 years ago
赵智超	ef89e75d0e	add request review from specific reviewers feature in pull request (#10756 ) * add request review feature in pull request add a way to notify specific reviewers to review like github , by add or delet a special type review . The acton is is similar to Assign , so many code reuse the function and items of Assignee, but the meaning and result is different. The Permission style is is similar to github, that only writer can add a review request from Reviewers, but the poster can recall and remove a review request after a reviwer has revied even if he don't have Write Premission. only manager , the poster and reviewer of a request review can remove it. The reviewers can be requested to review contain all readers for private repo , for public, contain all writers and watchers. The offical Review Request will block merge if Reject can block it. an other change: add ui otify for Assignees. Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv> Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com> * new change * add placeholder string * do some changes follow #10238 to add review requests num on lists also change icon for review requests to eye Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>	5 years ago
mrsdizzie	8d99ee2773	Add Organization Wide Labels (#10814 ) * Add organization wide labels Implement organization wide labels similar to organization wide webhooks. This lets you create individual labels for organizations that can be used for all repos under that organization (so being able to reuse the same label across multiple repos). This makes it possible for small organizations with many repos to use labels effectively. Fixes #7406 * Add migration * remove comments * fix tests * Update options/locale/locale_en-US.ini Removed unused translation string * show org labels in issue search label filter * Use more clear var name * rename migration after merge from master * comment typo * update migration again after rebase with master * check for orgID <=0 per guillep2k review * fmt * Apply suggestions from code review Co-Authored-By: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com> * remove unused code * Make sure RepoID is 0 when searching orgID per code review * more changes/code review requests * More descriptive translation var per code review * func description/delete comment when issue label deleted instead of hiding it * remove comment * only use issues in that repo when calculating number of open issues for org label on repo label page * Add integration test for IssuesSearch API with labels * remove unused function * Update models/issue_label.go Co-Authored-By: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com> * Use subquery in GetLabelIDsInReposByNames * Fix tests to use correct orgID * fix more tests * IssuesSearch api now uses new BuildLabelNamesIssueIDsCondition. Add a few more tests as well * update comment for clarity * Revert previous code change now that we can use the new BuildLabelNamesIssueIDsCondition * Don't sort repos by date in IssuesSearch API After much debugging I've found a strange issue where in some cases MySQL will return a different result than other enigines if a query is sorted by a null collumn. For example with our integration test data where we don't set updated_unix in repository fixtures: SELECT `id`, `owner_id`, `owner_name`, `lower_name`, `name`, `description`, `website`, `original_service_type`, `original_url`, `default_branch`, `num_watches`, `num_stars`, `num_forks`, `num_issues`, `num_closed_issues`, `num_pulls`, `num_closed_pulls`, `num_milestones`, `num_closed_milestones`, `is_private`, `is_empty`, `is_archived`, `is_mirror`, `status`, `is_fork`, `fork_id`, `is_template`, `template_id`, `size`, `is_fsck_enabled`, `close_issues_via_commit_in_any_branch`, `topics`, `avatar`, `created_unix`, `updated_unix` FROM `repository` ORDER BY updated_unix DESC LIMIT 15 OFFSET 45 Returns different results for MySQL than other engines. However, the similar query: SELECT `id`, `owner_id`, `owner_name`, `lower_name`, `name`, `description`, `website`, `original_service_type`, `original_url`, `default_branch`, `num_watches`, `num_stars`, `num_forks`, `num_issues`, `num_closed_issues`, `num_pulls`, `num_closed_pulls`, `num_milestones`, `num_closed_milestones`, `is_private`, `is_empty`, `is_archived`, `is_mirror`, `status`, `is_fork`, `fork_id`, `is_template`, `template_id`, `size`, `is_fsck_enabled`, `close_issues_via_commit_in_any_branch`, `topics`, `avatar`, `created_unix`, `updated_unix` FROM `repository` ORDER BY updated_unix DESC LIMIT 15 OFFSET 30 Returns the same results. This causes integration tests to fail on MySQL in certain cases but would never show up in a real installation. Since this API call always returns issues based on the optionally provided repo_priority_id or the issueID itself, there is no change to results by changing the repo sorting method used to get ids earlier in the function. * linter is back! * code review * remove now unused option * Fix newline at end of files * more unused code * update to master * check for matching ids before query * Update models/issue_label.go Co-Authored-By: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> * Update models/issue_label.go * update comments * Update routers/org/setting.go Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv> Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>	5 years ago
6543	39b507e3c4	Trigger webhooks on issue label-change via API too (#10421 ) * trigger webhooks with api too * fix comment * notify report old too * CI restart * restart CI again * remove duplicated code	5 years ago
Lunny Xiao	67b316a954	Refactor comment (#9330 ) * Refactor comment * fix test * improve code	5 years ago
Lunny Xiao	491887d441	Move actions to notification (#8785 )	5 years ago
Lunny Xiao	8f26397928	Move issue milestone assign to issue service and move webhook to notification (#8780 )	5 years ago
Lunny Xiao	4b8d9e58c5	Move labels webhooks to notification (#8749 ) * Move webhooks to notification * fix notification	5 years ago
Lunny Xiao	0e7f7df3cf	Move webhook to a standalone package under modules (#8747 ) * Move webhook to a standalone package under modules * fix test * fix comments	5 years ago
Lunny Xiao	f694bb45d7	Move issue change content from models to service (#8711 ) * Move issue change content from models to service * fix lint	5 years ago
Lunny Xiao	af8957bc4c	Move issue notifications (#8713 )	5 years ago
Lunny Xiao	c66c9dabc7	Move issue change status from models to service (#8691 )	5 years ago
Lunny Xiao	495d5e4329	Move more issue assignee code from models to issue service (#8690 ) * Move more issue assignee code from models to issue service * fix test	5 years ago
David Svantesson	6aa3f8bc29	Mail assignee when issue/pull request is assigned (#8546 ) * Send email to assigned user * Only send mail if enabled * Mail also when assigned through API * Need to refactor functions from models to issue service * Refer to issue index rather than ID * Disable email notifications completly at initalization if global disable * Check of user enbled mail shall be in mail notification function only * Initialize notifications from routers init function. * Use the assigned comment when sending assigned mail * Refactor so that assignees always added as separate step when new issue/pr. * Check error from AddAssignees * Check if user can be assiged to issue or pull request * Missing return * Refactor of CanBeAssigned check. CanBeAssigned shall have same check as UI. * Clarify function names (toggle rather than update/change), and clean up. * Fix review comments. * Flash error if assignees was not added when creating issue/pr * Generate error if assignee users doesn't exist	5 years ago
Lunny Xiao	280f4bebbf	Move issue label operations to issue service package (#8553 ) * Move issue label operations to issue service package * fix test * fix fmt	5 years ago
Lunny Xiao	20477a69ea	Move clearlabels from models to issue service (#8326 ) * move clearlabels from models to issue service * improve code * Apply suggestions from code review Co-Authored-By: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>	5 years ago
Lunny Xiao	46a12f196b	Move change issue title from models to issue service package (#8456 ) * move change issue title from models to issue service package * make the change less * fix typo	5 years ago
Lunny Xiao	e6113000c5	Extract actions on new issue from models to services (#8217 ) * extract actions on new issue from models to services * improve code * rename services/issues to services/issue	5 years ago

1 2

74 Commits (25dc1556cd70b567a4920beb002a0addfbfd6ef2)