This PR will avoid load pullrequest.Issue twice in pull request list
page. It will reduce x times database queries for those WIP pull
requests.
Partially fix#29585
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
It is convenient to skip by setting environment, since it's OK
to use root user in job containers.
It's not a bug, but I want to backport it to v1.21 since it doesn't
break anything.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Caused by: #23106
Fix:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/actions/runs/8274650046/job/22640335697
1. Delete `UserBadgeList` in `options.go`, because it wasn't used. (The
struct defined in `options.go` is the struct used to parse the request
body)
2. Move `BadgeList` struct under `routers/api/v1/swagger` folder which
response should be defined in.
This PR do some loading speed optimization for feeds user interface
pages.
- Load action users batchly but not one by one.
- Load action repositories batchly but not one by one.
- Load action's Repo Owners batchly but not one by one.
- Load action's possible issues batchly but not one by one.
- Load action's possible comments batchly but not one by one.
Most time, when invoking `git.OpenRepository`, `objectFormat` will not
be used, so it's a waste to invoke commandline to get the object format.
This PR make it a lazy operation, only invoke that when necessary.
The internal links to other files in the repository were not rendering
with the Src Prefix (/src/branch-name/file-path). This commit fixes that
by using the `SrcLink` as base if available.
Resolves#29668
There is a fundamental design problem of the "manager" and the "wait
group".
If nothing has started, the "Wait" just panics: sync: WaitGroup is
reused before previous Wait has returned
There is no clear solution besides a complete rewriting of the "manager"
If there are some mistakes in the app.ini, end users would just see the
"panic", but not the real error messages. A real case: #27643
This PR is just a quick fix for the annoying panic problem.
Fix#29136
Before: The result is a table and all line numbers are all in one row.
After: Use a separate table column for the line numbers.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
* "mail/issue/default.tmpl": the body is rendered by backend
`markdown.RenderString() HTML`, it has been already sanitized
* "repo/settings/webhook/base_list.tmpl": "Description" is prepared by
backend `ctx.Tr`, it doesn't need to be sanitized
Part of #23318
Add menu in repo settings to allow for repo admin to decide not just if
projects are enabled or disabled per repo, but also which kind of
projects (repo-level/owner-level) are enabled. If repo projects
disabled, don't show the projects tab.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Add new option:
`visible`: witch can hide a specific field of the form or the created
content afterwards
It is a string array witch can contain `form` and `content`. If only
`form` is present, it wont show up in the created issue afterwards and
the other way around. By default it sets both except for markdown
As they are optional and github don't have any similar thing, it is non
breaking and also do not conflict with it.
With this you can:
- define "post issue creation" elements like a TODO list to track an
issue state
- make sure to have a checkbox that reminds the user to check for a
thing but dont have it in the created issue afterwards
- define markdown for the created issue (was the downside of using yaml
instead of md in the past)
- ...
## Demo
```yaml
name: New Contribution
description: External Contributor creating a pull
body:
- type: checkboxes
id: extern-todo
visible: [form]
attributes:
label: Contribution Guidelines
options:
- label: I checked there exist no similar feature to be extended
required: true
- label: I did read the CONTRIBUTION.MD
required: true
- type: checkboxes
id: intern-todo
visible: [content]
attributes:
label: Maintainer Check-List
options:
- label: Does this pull follow the KISS principe
- label: Checked if internal bord was notifyed
# ....
```
[Demo
Video](https://cloud.obermui.de/s/tm34fSAbJp9qw9z/download/vid-20240220-152751.mkv)
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
---------
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Without `case <-t.C`, the workers would stop incorrectly, the test won't
pass. For the worse case, there might be only one running worker
processing the queue items for long time because other workers are
stopped. The root cause is related to the logic of doDispatchBatchToWorker.
It isn't a serious problem at the moment, so keep it as-is.
wxiaoguang
Lunny Xiao
Jason Song
coldWater
Nanguan Lin
6543
Yarden Shoham
coldWater
silverwind
sillyguodong
KN4CK3R
6543
pengqiseven
yp05327
Ankit R Gadiya
Denys Konovalov