Percentage-based `border-radius` [creates undesirable
ellipse](https://jsfiddle.net/silverwind/j9ko5wnt/4/) on non-square
content. Instead, use pixel value and use same wording `full` like
tailwind does, but increast to 99999px over their 9999px.
Enable us to use tailwind's
[`font-family`](https://tailwindcss.com/docs/font-family) classes as
well as remove `gt-mono` in favor of `tw-font-mono`. I also merged the
"compensation" to one selector, previously this was two different values
0.9em and 0.95em. I did not declare a `serif` font because I don't think
there will ever be a use case for those. Command ran:
```sh
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-mono#tw-font-mono#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/*
We have to define this one in helpers.css because tailwind only
generates a single class but certain things rely on this being
double-class. Command ran:
```sh
perl -p -i -e 's#gt-hidden#tw-hidden#g' web_src/js/**/* templates/**/* models/**/* web_src/css/**/*
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Migrate `gt-font-*` to `tw-text-*` All tailwind-original class names are
also available and render like they would with 16px root font size.
We currently have root font size at 14px, but I would like to eventually
migrate us to 16px so that the tailwind docs apply to us unchangend and
because 16px is the recommended root font size for web pages in general.
Also the number 16 is much better dividable than 14 so will result in
more integers.
We need to scan `.go` files for tailwind classes. Does not seem to
affect build time much luckily.
Fixes:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29678#discussion_r1518448600
Verified via `rg tw-object-contain public/assets/css/index.css`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Tailwind content is not going to appear in `web_src/css`,
`web_src/fomantic` or `web_src/svg` or the JSON templates, so we don't
need to have tailwind scan these directories which will speed up the
build.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
As per discussion in https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29423, I
think this is the right way that does not burden developers having to
think about CSS precedence which should be irrelevant with an atomic CSS
framework.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Sebastian Luino
silverwind