a1f5dd7677
Make runs-on support variable expression ( #29468 )
...
As title.
Close issue: https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/445
Follow: https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/91
Move `getSecretsOfTask` and `getVariablesOfTask` under `models` because
of circular dependency issues.
9 months ago
a9bc590d5d
Add artifacts v4 jwt to job message and accept it ( #28885 )
...
This change allows act_runner / actions_runner to use jwt tokens for
`ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN` that are compatible with
actions/upload-artifact@v4.
The official Artifact actions are now validating and extracting the jwt
claim scp to get the runid and jobid, the old artifact backend also
needs to accept the same token jwt.
---
Related to #28853
I'm not familar with the auth system, maybe you know how to improve this
I have tested
- the jwt token is a valid token for artifact uploading
- the jwt token can be parsed by actions/upload-artifact@v4 and passes
their scp claim validation
Next steps would be a new artifacts@v4 backend.
~~I'm linking the act_runner change soonish.~~
act_runner change to make the change effective and use jwt tokens
<https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/471 >
10 months ago
d0f24ff4ca
Added instance-level variables ( #28115 )
...
This PR adds instance-level variables, and so closes #27726
11 months ago
df1e7d0067
Use db.Find instead of writing methods for every object ( #28084 )
...
For those simple objects, it's unnecessary to write the find and count
methods again and again.
1 year ago
5315153059
Use `Set[Type]` instead of `map[Type]bool/struct{}`. ( #26804 )
1 year ago
4f5a2117c3
Include the GITHUB_TOKEN/GITEA_TOKEN secret for fork pull requests ( #26759 )
...
Include `GITHUB_TOKEN`/`GITEA_TOKEN` secrets for actions triggered by
pull requests
This makes it consistent with the environment variables which you can
already access
```shell
echo env: $GITHUB_TOKEN
echo expression: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
```
before
after
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
1 year ago
a42a838843
Fix `ref` for workflows triggered by `pull_request_target` ( #25743 )
...
Follow #25229
At present, when the trigger event is `pull_request_target`, the `ref`
and `sha` of `ActionRun` are set according to the base branch of the
pull request. This makes it impossible for us to find the head branch of
the `ActionRun` directly. In this PR, the `ref` and `sha` will always be
set to the head branch and they will be changed to the base branch when
generating the task context.
1 year ago
88f835192d
Replace `interface{}` with `any` ( #25686 )
...
Result of running `perl -p -i -e 's#interface\{\}#any#g' **/*` and `make fmt`.
Basically the same [as golang did](2580d0e08d
1 year ago
67bd9d4f1e
Restrict `[actions].DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` to only `github` or `self` ( #25581 )
...
Resolve #24789
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
Before this, `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` cound be set to any custom URLs like
`https://gitea.com ` or `http://your-git-server,https://gitea.com `, and
the default value was `https://gitea.com `.
But now, `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` supports only
`github`(`https://github.com `) or `self`(the root url of current Gitea
instance), and the default value is `github`.
If it has configured with a URL, an error log will be displayed and it
will fallback to `github`.
Actually, what we really want to do is always make it
`https://github.com `, however, this may not be acceptable for some
instances of internal use, so there's extra support for `self`, but no
more, even `https://gitea.com `.
Please note that `uses: https://xxx/yyy/zzz ` always works and it does
exactly what it is supposed to do.
Although it's breaking, I belive it should be backported to `v1.20` due
to some security issues.
Follow-up on the runner side:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/262
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/70
1 year ago
48e5a74f21
Support `pull_request_target` event ( #25229 )
...
Fix #25088
This PR adds the support for
[`pull_request_target`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_target )
workflow trigger. `pull_request_target` is similar to `pull_request`,
but the workflow triggered by the `pull_request_target` event runs in
the context of the base branch of the pull request rather than the head
branch. Since the workflow from the base is considered trusted, it can
access the secrets and doesn't need approvals to run.
1 year ago
35a653d7ed
Support configuration variables on Gitea Actions ( #24724 )
...
Co-Author: @silverwind @wxiaoguang
Replace: #24404
See:
- [defining configuration variables for multiple
workflows](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/variables#defining-configuration-variables-for-multiple-workflows )
- [vars
context](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/contexts#vars-context )
Related to:
- [x] protocol: https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def/pulls/7
- [x] act_runner: https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/157
- [x] act: https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/43
#### Screenshoot
Create Variable:
Workflow:
```yaml
test_vars:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Print Custom Variables
run: echo "${{ vars.test_key }}"
- name: Try to print a non-exist var
run: echo "${{ vars.NON_EXIST_VAR }}"
```
Actions Log:
---
This PR just implement the org / user (depends on the owner of the
current repository) and repo level variables, The Environment level
variables have not been implemented.
Because
[Environment](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/deployment/targeting-different-environments/using-environments-for-deployment#about-environments )
is a module separate from `Actions`. Maybe it would be better to create
a new PR to do it.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
1 year ago
bd2e3226be
Fix incorrect actions ref_name ( #25358 )
...
Fix #25357 .
Just a simple fix the result of `${{ gitea.ref_name }}` to show the
shortened name rather than the full ref.
1 year ago
419804fd4d
Fix compatible for webhook ref type ( #25195 )
...
Fix #25185
Caused by #24634
1 year ago
e4922d484b
Fix ref type error ( #24941 )
2 years ago
f9cfd6ce5b
Use the type RefName for all the needed places and fix pull mirror sync bugs ( #24634 )
...
This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the
code more maintainable.
Fix #15367
Replaces #23070
It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune
origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed.
We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git
remote update origin` to do the sync.
Some answer from ChatGPT as ref.
> If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected,
there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check:
>
>Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your
system. You can check the version by running git --version in your
terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if
that resolves the issue.
>
>Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the
remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config
--get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes
+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git
config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*".
>
>Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the
remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags
origin to list all the tags on the remote repository.
>
>Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags
on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the
git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete
local tags using the git tag -d command.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2 years ago
6dfc0c87ec
Gitea Actions add `base_ref`, `head_ref`, `api_url`, `ref_type` fields ( #24356 )
...
As discussed in https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/147
`github.base_ref` is empty.
This change adds these fields to the server side context data.
2 years ago
ac384c4e1d
Support upload `outputs` and use `needs` context on Actions ( #24230 )
...
See [Defining outputs for
jobs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-jobs/defining-outputs-for-jobs )
and [Example usage of the needs
context](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/contexts#example-usage-of-the-needs-context ).
Related to:
- [actions-proto-def
#5 ](https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def/pulls/5 )
- [act_runner #133 ](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/133 )
<details>
<summary>Tests & screenshots</summary>
Test workflow file:
```yaml
name: outputs
on: push
jobs:
job1:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
outputs:
output1: ${{ steps.step1.outputs.output1 }}
output2: ${{ steps.step2.outputs.output2 }}
steps:
- name: step1
id: step1
run: |
date -Is > output1
cat output1
echo "output1=$(cat output1)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
- name: step2
id: step2
run: |
cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid > output2
cat output2
echo "output2=$(cat output2)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
job2:
needs: job1
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- run: echo ${{ needs.job1.outputs.output1 }}
- run: echo ${{ needs.job1.outputs.output2 }}
- run: echo ${{ needs.job1.result }}
```
<img width="397" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/233313322-903e7ebf-49a7-48e2-8c17-95a4581b3284.png ">
<img width="385" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/233313442-30909135-1711-4b78-a5c6-133fcc79f47c.png ">
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2 years ago
3876f56c7b
Set `ref` to fully-formed of the tag when trigger event is `release` ( #23944 )
...
Fix #23943
When trigger event is `release`, ref should be like
`refs/tags/<tag_name>` instead of `CommitID`
2 years ago
3e8db31a5b
Refactor commit status for Actions jobs ( #23786 )
...
Before:
<img width="353" alt="xnip_230329_163852"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/228479807-424452df-10fa-45cf-ae4b-09939c0ed54c.png ">
After:
<img width="508" alt="xnip_230329_163358"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/228479923-537b54fe-9564-4105-a068-bcc75fa2a7ea.png ">
Highlights:
- Treat `StatusSkipped` as `CommitStatusSuccess` instead of
`CommitStatusFailure`, so it fixed #23599 .
- Use the bot user `gitea-actions` instead of the trigger as the creator
of commit status.
- New format `<run_name> / <job_name> / (<event>)` for the context of
commit status to avoid conflicts.
- Add descriptions for commit status.
- Add the missing calls to `CreateCommitStatus`.
- Refactor `CreateCommitStatus` to make it easier to use.
2 years ago
4011821c94
Implement actions ( #21937 )
...
Close #13539 .
Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others.
Related projects:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner
### Summary
The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions",
an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been
merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note
that:
- It is disabled by default;
- It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently;
- It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently;
- Breaking changes may be made before it's stable.
**Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design
ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this
PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**.
### ⚠️ Breaking
`gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the
name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it.
### Some important reviews
- What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954
- Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592
- Why DBFS?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178
- Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103
- Why there's no permission control for actions?
- https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868
### What it looks like
<details>
#### Manage runners
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png ">
#### List runs
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png ">
#### View logs
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png ">
</details>
### How to try it
<details>
#### 1. Start Gitea
Clone this branch and [install from
source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source ).
Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions:
```ini
[actions]
ENABLED = true
```
Start it.
If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png ">
#### 2. Start runner
Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner ), and follow
the
[README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md )
to start it.
If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png ">
#### 3. Enable actions for a repo
Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox
in settings and submit.
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png ">
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png ">
If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions":
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png ">
#### 4. Upload workflow files
Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can
follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart )
of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions
in most cases, you can use the same demo:
```yaml
name: GitHub Actions Demo
run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀
on: [push]
jobs:
Explore-GitHub-Actions:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event."
- run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!"
- run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}."
- name: Check out repository code
uses: actions/checkout@v3
- run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner."
- run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner."
- name: List files in the repository
run: |
ls ${{ github.workspace }}
- run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}."
```
If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png ">
#### 5. Check the logs of jobs
Click a run and you'll see the logs:
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png ">
#### 6. Go on
You can try more examples in [the
documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions )
of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs.
Come on, PRs are welcome.
</details>
See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea
Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/ )
---------
Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2 years ago
sillyguodong
ChristopherHX
Jean-Baptiste Gomond
Lunny Xiao
KN4CK3R
js6pak
Zettat123
silverwind
Jason Song
Daniel Wolf
