Backport #33262 by ExplodingDragon
Only show the latest version of the package in the arch repo.
closes#33534
Co-authored-by: Exploding Dragon <explodingfkl@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #33543
In the old `pickTask`, when getting secrets or variables failed, the
task could get stuck in the `running` status (task status is `running`
but the runner did not fetch the task). To fix this issue, these steps
should be in one transaction.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR created a mock webhook server in the tests and added integration
tests for generic webhooks.
It also fixes bugs in package webhooks and pull request comment
webhooks.
This also corrected an error on the package webhook. The previous
implementation uses a `User` struct as an organization, now it has been
corrected but it will not be consistent with the previous
implementation, some fields which not belong to the organization have
been removed.
Backport #33396
Backport part of #33337
Try to backport #33315, the only trivial conflict is in the helper
functions map in the helper.go
Fix#33333
Co-authored-by: Sysoev, Vladimir <i@vsysoev.ru>
Backport #33147 by changchaishi
Fixes#33145
An integration test could be added.
---------
Co-authored-by: Chai-Shi <changchaishi@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #32999 by @a1012112796
user with read permission should also can create agit flow pull request.
looks this logic was broken in
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/31033 this pull request try fix
it and add test code.
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #32946 by wxiaoguang
Fix#23703
When Gitea starts, it reads GITEA_RUNNER_REGISTRATION_TOKEN
or GITEA_RUNNER_REGISTRATION_TOKEN_FILE to add registration token.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #32881 by ExplodingDragon
Incorrect content was introduced while generating the index, which has
now been removed, and the missing fields have been added.
Co-authored-by: Exploding Dragon <explodingfkl@gmail.com>
Replace #26661, fix#25979
Not perfect, but usable and much better than before. Since it is quite
complex, I am not quite sure whether there would be any regression, if
any, I will fix in first time.
I have tested the related pages many times: issue list, milestone issue
list, project view, user issue list, org issue list.
Resolve#31492
The response time for the Pull Requests API has improved significantly,
dropping from over `2000ms` to about `350ms` on my local machine. It's
about `6` times faster.
A key area for further optimization lies in batch-fetching data for
`apiPullRequest.ChangedFiles, apiPullRequest.Additions, and
apiPullRequest.Deletions`.
Tests `TestAPIViewPulls` does exist and new tests added.
- This PR also fixes some bugs in `GetDiff` functions.
- This PR also fixes data inconsistent in test data. For a pull request,
the head branch's reference should be equal to the reference in
`pull/xxx/head`.
Redesign the time tracker side bar, and add "time estimate" support (in "1d 2m" format)
Closes#23112
---------
Co-authored-by: stuzer05 <stuzer05@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Giteabot
wxiaoguang
Lunny Xiao
TheFox0x7
yp05327
Illya Marchenko
KN4CK3R