If the assign the pull request review to a team, it did not show the
members of the team in the "requested_reviewers" field, so the field was
null. As a solution, I added the team members to the array.
fix#31764
This PR adds some fields to the gitea webhook payload that
[openproject](https://www.openproject.org/) expects to exists in order
to process the webhooks.
These fields do exists in Github's webhook payload so adding them makes
Gitea's native webhook more compatible towards Github's.
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves#2175.
## Screenshots
![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123207-0aa39869-bb48-45c3-abe2-ba1e836046ec.png)
![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123297-152a16ea-a857-451d-9a42-61f2cd54dd75.png)
![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235640782-cbfe25ec-6254-479a-a3de-133e585d7a2d.png)
The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.
## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.
## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration
**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321
Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull
Request.
Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload`
based on the GitHub webhook settings, including:
- add a description of the current reviewer object as
`RequestedReviewer` .
- setting the action to either **review_requested** or
**review_request_removed** based on the operation.
- adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest.
This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through
`LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called.
After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant
documentation.
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.
Fix#16132
Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
This adds an api endpoint `/files` to PRs that allows to get a list of changed files.
built upon #18228, reviews there are included
closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/654
Co-authored-by: Anton Bracke <anton@ju60.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Adds a feature [like GitHub has](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/proposing-changes-to-your-work-with-pull-requests/creating-a-pull-request-from-a-fork) (step 7).
If you create a new PR from a forked repo, you can select (and change later, but only if you are the PR creator/poster) the "Allow edits from maintainers" option.
Then users with write access to the base branch get more permissions on this branch:
* use the update pull request button
* push directly from the command line (`git push`)
* edit/delete/upload files via web UI
* use related API endpoints
You can't merge PRs to this branch with this enabled, you'll need "full" code write permissions.
This feature has a pretty big impact on the permission system. I might forgot changing some things or didn't find security vulnerabilities. In this case, please leave a review or comment on this PR.
Closes#17728
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* Handle deadline is zero (to remove deadline)
* Better API documentation for issue deadline.
* Add parameter to unset due date.
* Update pull edit API comment
* add more webhook support
* move hooks templates to standalone dir and add more webhooks ui
* fix tests
* update vendor checksum
* add more webhook support
* move hooks templates to standalone dir and add more webhooks ui
* fix tests
* update vendor checksum
* update vendor
Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
* load attributes when created release
* update comparsion doc
* Started adding deadline to ui
* Implemented basic issue due date managing
* Improved UI for due date managing
* Added at least write access to the repo in order to modify issue due dates
* Ui improvements
* Added issue comments creation when adding/modifying/removing a due date
* Show due date in issue list
* Added api support for issue due dates
* Fixed lint suggestions
* Added deadline to sdk
* Updated css
* Added support for adding/modifiying deadlines for pull requests via api
* Fixed comments not created when updating or removing a deadline
* update sdk (will do properly once go-gitea/go-sdk#103 is merged)
* enhanced updateIssueDeadline
* Removed unnessecary Issue.DeadlineString
* UI improvements
* Small improvments to comment creation
+ ui & validation improvements
* Check if an issue is overdue is now a seperate function
* Updated go-sdk with govendor as it was merged
* Simplified isOverdue method
* removed unessecary deadline to 0 set
* Update swagger definitions
* Added missing return
* Added an explanary comment
* Improved updateIssueDeadline method so it'll only update `deadline_unix`
* Small changes and improvements
* no need to explicitly load the issue when updating a deadline, just use whats already there
* small optimisations
* Added check if a deadline was modified before updating it
* Moved comment creating logic into its own function
* Code cleanup for creating deadline comment
* locale improvement
* When modifying a deadline, the old deadline is saved with the comment
* small improvments to xorm session handling when updating an issue deadline
+ style nitpicks
* style nitpicks
* Moved checking for if the user has write acces to middleware
* Add Attachment API
* repos/:owner/:repo/releases (add attachments)
* repos/:owner/:repo/releases/:id (add attachments)
* repos/:owner/:repo/releases/:id/attachments
* repos/:owner/:repo/releases/:id/attachments/:attachment_id
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.de>
* Add unit tests for new attachment functions
Fix comments
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* fix lint
* Update vendor.json
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* remove version of sdk
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Fix unit tests
Add missing license header
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Add CreateReleaseAttachment
Add EditReleaseAttachment
Add DeleteReleaseAttachment
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Add filename query parameter for choosing another name for an attachment
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Fix order of imports
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Restricting updatable attachment columns
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* gofmt
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Update go-sdk
Replace Attachments with Assets
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.de>
* Update go-sdk
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.de>
* Updating go-sdk and regenerating swagger
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Add missing file of go-sdk
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Change origin of code.gitea.io/sdk to code.gitea.io/sdk
Update code.gitea.io/sdk
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Update swagger
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Update updateAttachment