This change adds an entry to the `links` field of the
`/.well-known/webfinger` response. The new entry points to the `appURL`
as an OpenID issuer. This is consistent with the output of
`/.well-known/openid-configuration`, which also uses the value of
`appURL`.
This change is required for Tailscale SSO to work, as it uses the OpenID
Issuer URL when querying the Tailscale user email during signup/login
([docs](https://tailscale.com/kb/1240/sso-custom-oidc/#webfinger-setup)).
Followup to https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25935 which has
missed to change the icon on the repolist because the logic is not
shared with templates.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
- Tell the renderer to use the `document` mode, so it's consistent with
other renderers.
- Use the same padding as `.file-view.markup`, so it's consistent with
other containers that contain markup rendering.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/833
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
This commit removes the hard-coded height of 500px, using that as a
max-height instead. The height of items in the dropdown menu, assuming a
default font size of 16px, is 36px, so the old CSS would cause overly
large dropdown menus in instances where less than 14 languages are
offered.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1000
Co-authored-by: rome-user <rome-user@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Bumping `github.com/golang-jwt/jwt` from v4 to v5.
`github.com/golang-jwt/jwt` v5 is bringing some breaking changes:
- standard `Valid()` method on claims is removed. It's replaced by
`ClaimsValidator` interface implementing `Validator()` method instead,
which is called after standard validation. Gitea doesn't seem to be
using this logic.
- `jwt.Token` has a field `Valid`, so it's checked in `ParseToken`
function in `services/auth/source/oauth2/token.go`
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Update WorkPath/WORK_PATH related documents, remove out-dated
information.
Remove "StaticRootPath" on the admin config display page, because few
end user really need it, it only causes misconfiguration.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Before: the concept "Content string" is used everywhere. It has some
problems:
1. Sometimes it means "base64 encoded content", sometimes it means "raw
binary content"
2. It doesn't work with large files, eg: uploading a 1G LFS file would
make Gitea process OOM
This PR does the refactoring: use "ContentReader" / "ContentBase64"
instead of "Content"
This PR is not breaking because the key in API JSON is still "content":
`` ContentBase64 string `json:"content"` ``
Move `public/*` to `public/assets/*`
Some old PRs (like #15219) introduced inconsistent directory system.
For example: why the local directory "public" is accessed by
`http://site/assets`? How to serve the ".well-known" files properly in
the public directory?
For convention rules, the "public" directory is widely used for the
website's root directory. It shouldn't be an exception for Gitea.
So, this PR makes the things consistent:
* `http://site/assets/foo` means `{CustomPath}/public/assets/foo`.
* `{CustomPath}/public/.well-known` and `{CustomPath}/public/robots.txt`
can be used in the future.
This PR is also a prerequisite for a clear solution for:
* #21942
* #25892
* discourse.gitea.io: [.well-known path serving custom files behind
proxy?](https://discourse.gitea.io/t/well-known-path-serving-custom-files-behind-proxy/5445/1)
This PR is breaking for users who have custom "public" files (CSS/JS).
After getting approvals, I will update the documents.
----
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
If you have files in your "custom/public/" folder, please move them to
"custom/public/assets/".
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Regression: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24805Closes: #25945
- Disallow `javascript`, `vbscript` and `data` (data uri images still
work) url schemes even if all other schemes are allowed
- Fixed older `cbthunderlink` tests
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
The "creating dir/file during load config" is a longstanding and complex
problem.
This PR only does a quick patch, it still needs more refactorings in the
future.
Fix#25938
Previously, `sortablejs` was imported twice, once synchronously and once
asynchronously, leading to webpack creating duplicate output code (once
in the index bundle, and once in a separate chunk). Fix this by always
asynchronously importing it. This was one of the build warnings observed
when trying to build with vite.
Before, in dev mode, there might be some error logs like:
```
2023/07/17 13:54:51 ...s/assetfs/layered.go:221:WatchLocalChanges() [E] Unable to watch directory .: lstat /data/work/gitea/custom/templates: no such file or directory
```
Because there is no "custom/templates" directory.
After: ignore such error, no such error message anymore.
Got the same problem as #25915 when updating an instance. The
`log.Fatal` should have been marked as breaking in #23911.
This PR adds a notice that the system is shutting down because of the
deprecated setting.
Use a real button and add an aria-label.
Additionally, show the button whenever it is focused.
See https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/998 for explanation.
Our handling of this button is now equal to that of GitHub.
Nothing has changed visually.
Issue filters are being used on repo list page and on milestone issues
page, and the code is mostly duplicated.
This PR does the following changes:
- move issue filters into a shared template
- allow filtering milestone issues by project, so no need to hide this
filter on milestone issues page
- remove some dead code (e. g. issue actions in milestone issues
template)
- fix label filter dropdown width
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
The `FileBlame` function looks strange, it has `revision` as argument
but doesn't use it.
Since the function never be used, I think we could just remove it.
If anyone thinks it should be kept, please help fix `revision`.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Before:
After:
This issue comes from the change in #25468.
`LoadProject` will always return at least one record, so we use
`ProjectID` to check whether an issue is linked to a project in the old
code.
As other `issue.LoadXXX` functions, we need to check the return value
from `xorm.Session.Get`.
In recent unit tests, we only test `issueList.LoadAttributes()` but
don't test `issue.LoadAttributes()`. So I added a new test for
`issue.LoadAttributes()` in this PR.
---------
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <privat@denyskon.de>
John Olheiser
wxiaoguang
jeremiepozzigithub
Noah Snelson
Lunny Xiao
GiteaBot
silverwind
Earl Warren
harryzcy
Jason Song
KN4CK3R
techknowlogick
puni9869
delvh
yp05327
sebastian-sauer
hiifong
M Hickford
Denys Konovalov
HesterG