13 Commits (e97e883ad50774f249c8c694598c25a17227299b)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Jason Song	8cf3b61fb9	Add optimistic lock to ActionRun table (#26563) ... Should fix #26559. How xorm works: https://xorm.io/docs/chapter-06/1.lock/ --------- Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>	1 year ago
Bo-Yi Wu	44781f9f5c	Implement auto-cancellation of concurrent jobs if the event is push (#25716) ... - cancel running jobs if the event is push - Add a new function `CancelRunningJobs` to cancel all running jobs of a run - Update `FindRunOptions` struct to include `Ref` field and update its condition in `toConds` function - Implement auto cancellation of running jobs in the same workflow in `notify` function related task: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22751/ --------- Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: appleboy <appleboy.tw@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>	1 year ago
sillyguodong	f5c7d4cfdd	Reduce unnecessary DB queries for Actions tasks (#25199) ... Close #24544 Changes: - Create `action_tasks_version` table to store the latest version of each scope (global, org and repo). - When a job with the status of `waiting` is created, the tasks version of the scopes it belongs to will increase. - When the status of a job already in the database is updated to `waiting`, the tasks version of the scopes it belongs to will increase. - On Gitea side, in `FeatchTask()`, will try to query the `action_tasks_version` record of the scope of the runner that call `FetchTask()`. If the record does not exist, will insert a row. Then, Gitea will compare the version passed from runner to Gitea with the version in database, if inconsistent, try pick task. Gitea always returns the latest version from database to the runner. Related: - Protocol: https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def/pulls/10 - Runner: https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/219	1 year ago
Zettat123	48e5a74f21	Support `pull_request_target` event (#25229) ... Fix #25088 This PR adds the support for [`pull_request_target`](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request_target) workflow trigger. `pull_request_target` is similar to `pull_request`, but the workflow triggered by the `pull_request_target` event runs in the context of the base branch of the pull request rather than the head branch. Since the workflow from the base is considered trusted, it can access the secrets and doesn't need approvals to run.	1 year ago
Lunny Xiao	f9cfd6ce5b	Use the type RefName for all the needed places and fix pull mirror sync bugs (#24634) ... This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the code more maintainable. Fix #15367 Replaces #23070 It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed. We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git remote update origin` to do the sync. Some answer from ChatGPT as ref. > If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected, there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check: > >Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your system. You can check the version by running git --version in your terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if that resolves the issue. > >Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config --get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes +refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*". > >Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags origin to list all the tags on the remote repository. > >Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete local tags using the git tag -d command. --------- Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>	1 year ago
Jason Song	d92909fa8b	Treat PRs with agit flow as fork PRs when triggering actions. (#23884) ... There is no fork concept in agit flow, anyone with read permission can push `refs/for/<target-branch>/<topic-branch>` to the repo. So we should treat it as a fork pull request because it may be from an untrusted user.	2 years ago
Jason Song	964a057a76	Fix checks for `needs` in Actions (#23789) ... Fix: - https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/77 - https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/81 Before: <img width="1489" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/228501567-f752cf87-a7ed-42c6-8f3d-ba741795c1fe.png"> Highlights: - Upgrade act to make things doable, related to - https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/32 - https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/33 - https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/35 - Make `needs` works - Sort jobs in the original order in the workflow files	2 years ago
sillyguodong	023e61e678	Create commit status when event is `pull_request_sync` (#23683) ... Fix: #23674 If the type of `hook_event` is `pull_request_sync`, also need to insert a record of `commit_status` into DB. Because `pull_request` event and `pull_request_sync` event have the same payload, so the code is reusable. Screenshot: 	2 years ago
sillyguodong	5eea61dbc8	Fix missing commit status in PR which from forked repo (#23351) ... close: #23347 ### Reference and Inference According to Github REST API [doc](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/commits/statuses?apiVersion=2022-11-28#list-commit-statuses-for-a-reference): 1. The `Drone CI` that can create some commit status by [API](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/commits/statuses?apiVersion=2022-11-28#create-a-commit-status) is enabled in `go-gitea/gitea`. So I tried to call the API to get a commit status list of a PR which is commited to upstream repo(`go-gitea/gitea`). As a result, the API returned a array of commit status.  2. Then I tried to call the API to get commit status list of the reference which of the `SHA` is the same as step 1 in the repo which is forked from `go-gitea/gitea`. But I got a empty array.  So, I believe it that： 1. The commit status is not shared between upstream repo and forked repo. 2. The coomit status is bound to a repo that performs actions. (Gitea's logic is the same) ### Cause During debugging, I found it that commit status are not stored in the DB as expected. So, I located the following code: 8cadd51bf2/services/actions/commit_status.go (L18-L26) When I create a PR, the type of `event` is `pull request`, not `push`. So the code return function directly. ### Screenshot    ### Other In this PR, I also fix the problem of missing icon which represents running in PRs list.  	2 years ago
Jason Song	cbc9a0fe47	Avoid too long names for actions (#23162) ... The name of the job or step comes from the workflow file, while the name of the runner comes from its registration. If the strings used for these names are too long, they could cause db issues.	2 years ago
Jason Song	edf98a2dc3	Require approval to run actions for fork pull request (#22803) ... Currently, Gitea will run actions automatically which are triggered by fork pull request. It's a security risk, people can create a PR and modify the workflow yamls to execute a malicious script. So we should require approval for first-time contributors, which is the default strategy of a public repo on GitHub, see [Approving workflow runs from public forks](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/managing-workflow-runs/approving-workflow-runs-from-public-forks). Current strategy: - don't need approval if it's not a fork PR; - always need approval if the user is restricted; - don't need approval if the user can write; - don't need approval if the user has been approved before; - otherwise, need approval. https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217207121-badf50a8-826c-4425-bef1-d82d1979bc81.mov GitHub has an option for that, you can see that at `/<owner>/<repo>/settings/actions`, and we can support that later. <img width="835" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217199990-2967e68b-e693-4e59-8186-ab33a1314a16.png"> --------- Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>	2 years ago
Jason Song	707ecec715	Fix ref to trigger Actions (#22679) ... If triggered by PR, the ref should be `pull/<index>/head` instead of `repo.DefaultBranch`. And improve UI: <img width="493" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/215731280-312564f2-2450-45d0-b986-1accb0670976.png"> Related to #21937.	2 years ago
Jason Song	4011821c94	Implement actions (#21937) ... Close #13539. Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others. Related projects: - https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def - https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go - https://gitea.com/gitea/act - https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner ### Summary The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions", an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note that: - It is disabled by default; - It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently; - It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently; - Breaking changes may be made before it's stable. **Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**. ### ⚠️ Breaking `gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it. ### Some important reviews - What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954 - Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592 - Why DBFS? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178 - Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103 - Why there's no permission control for actions? - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868 ### What it looks like <details> #### Manage runners <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png"> #### List runs <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png"> #### View logs <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png"> </details> ### How to try it <details> #### 1. Start Gitea Clone this branch and [install from source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source). Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions: ```ini [actions] ENABLED = true ``` Start it. If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png"> #### 2. Start runner Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner), and follow the [README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md) to start it. If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png"> #### 3. Enable actions for a repo Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox in settings and submit. <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png"> <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png"> If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions": <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png"> #### 4. Upload workflow files Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart) of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions in most cases, you can use the same demo: ```yaml name: GitHub Actions Demo run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀 on: [push] jobs: Explore-GitHub-Actions: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event." - run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!" - run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}." - name: Check out repository code uses: actions/checkout@v3 - run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner." - run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner." - name: List files in the repository run: | ls ${{ github.workspace }} - run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}." ``` If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png"> #### 5. Check the logs of jobs Click a run and you'll see the logs: <img width="1792" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png"> #### 6. Go on You can try more examples in [the documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions) of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs. Come on, PRs are welcome. </details> See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/) --------- Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de> Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de> Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>	2 years ago