From 667966c5c10e7bf1e38a0439c62b11d5b26a132a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marius van der Wijden Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 10:38:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] eth/fetcher: fix fetcher timeout (#28220) This changes fixes a bug in the fetcher, where the timeout for how long to remember underpriced transaction was erroneously compared, and the timeout never hit. --------- Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende --- eth/fetcher/tx_fetcher.go | 10 +++++----- eth/fetcher/tx_fetcher_test.go | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/eth/fetcher/tx_fetcher.go b/eth/fetcher/tx_fetcher.go index 385f8c5271..60b07a2b4b 100644 --- a/eth/fetcher/tx_fetcher.go +++ b/eth/fetcher/tx_fetcher.go @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ const ( maxTxUnderpricedSetSize = 32768 // maxTxUnderpricedTimeout is the max time a transaction should be stuck in the underpriced set. - maxTxUnderpricedTimeout = int64(5 * time.Minute) + maxTxUnderpricedTimeout = 5 * time.Minute // txArriveTimeout is the time allowance before an announced transaction is // explicitly requested. @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ type TxFetcher struct { drop chan *txDrop quit chan struct{} - underpriced *lru.Cache[common.Hash, int64] // Transactions discarded as too cheap (don't re-fetch) + underpriced *lru.Cache[common.Hash, time.Time] // Transactions discarded as too cheap (don't re-fetch) // Stage 1: Waiting lists for newly discovered transactions that might be // broadcast without needing explicit request/reply round trips. @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ func NewTxFetcherForTests( fetching: make(map[common.Hash]string), requests: make(map[string]*txRequest), alternates: make(map[common.Hash]map[string]struct{}), - underpriced: lru.NewCache[common.Hash, int64](maxTxUnderpricedSetSize), + underpriced: lru.NewCache[common.Hash, time.Time](maxTxUnderpricedSetSize), hasTx: hasTx, addTxs: addTxs, fetchTxs: fetchTxs, @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ func (f *TxFetcher) Notify(peer string, types []byte, sizes []uint32, hashes []c // isKnownUnderpriced reports whether a transaction hash was recently found to be underpriced. func (f *TxFetcher) isKnownUnderpriced(hash common.Hash) bool { prevTime, ok := f.underpriced.Peek(hash) - if ok && prevTime+maxTxUnderpricedTimeout < time.Now().Unix() { + if ok && prevTime.Before(time.Now().Add(-maxTxUnderpricedTimeout)) { f.underpriced.Remove(hash) return false } @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ func (f *TxFetcher) Enqueue(peer string, txs []*types.Transaction, direct bool) // Avoid re-request this transaction when we receive another // announcement. if errors.Is(err, txpool.ErrUnderpriced) || errors.Is(err, txpool.ErrReplaceUnderpriced) { - f.underpriced.Add(batch[j].Hash(), batch[j].Time().Unix()) + f.underpriced.Add(batch[j].Hash(), batch[j].Time()) } // Track a few interesting failure types switch { diff --git a/eth/fetcher/tx_fetcher_test.go b/eth/fetcher/tx_fetcher_test.go index fbb9ff9dcc..77b89085d3 100644 --- a/eth/fetcher/tx_fetcher_test.go +++ b/eth/fetcher/tx_fetcher_test.go @@ -1993,3 +1993,38 @@ func containsHash(slice []common.Hash, hash common.Hash) bool { } return false } + +// Tests that a transaction is forgotten after the timeout. +func TestTransactionForgotten(t *testing.T) { + fetcher := NewTxFetcher( + func(common.Hash) bool { return false }, + func(txs []*types.Transaction) []error { + errs := make([]error, len(txs)) + for i := 0; i < len(errs); i++ { + errs[i] = txpool.ErrUnderpriced + } + return errs + }, + func(string, []common.Hash) error { return nil }, + func(string) {}, + ) + fetcher.Start() + defer fetcher.Stop() + // Create one TX which is 5 minutes old, and one which is recent + tx1 := types.NewTx(&types.LegacyTx{Nonce: 0}) + tx1.SetTime(time.Now().Add(-maxTxUnderpricedTimeout - 1*time.Second)) + tx2 := types.NewTx(&types.LegacyTx{Nonce: 1}) + + // Enqueue both in the fetcher. They will be immediately tagged as underpriced + if err := fetcher.Enqueue("asdf", []*types.Transaction{tx1, tx2}, false); err != nil { + t.Fatal(err) + } + // isKnownUnderpriced should trigger removal of the first tx (no longer be known underpriced) + if fetcher.isKnownUnderpriced(tx1.Hash()) { + t.Fatal("transaction should be forgotten by now") + } + // isKnownUnderpriced should not trigger removal of the second + if !fetcher.isKnownUnderpriced(tx2.Hash()) { + t.Fatal("transaction should be known underpriced") + } +}