go-ethereum

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
wangjingcun	16f2f7155f	all: typos in comments (#30779 ) fixes some typos	3 months ago
Martin HS	56c4f2bfd4	core/vm, cmd/evm: implement eof validation (#30418 ) The bulk of this PR is authored by @lightclient , in the original EOF-work. More recently, the code has been picked up and reworked for the new EOF specification, by @MariusVanDerWijden , in https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pull/29518, and also @shemnon has contributed with fixes. This PR is an attempt to start eating the elephant one small bite at a time, by selecting only the eof-validation as a standalone piece which can be merged without interfering too much in the core stuff. In this PR: - [x] Validation of eof containers, lifted from #29518, along with test-vectors from consensus-tests and fuzzing, to ensure that the move did not lose any functionality. - [x] Definition of eof opcodes, which is a prerequisite for validation - [x] Addition of `undefined` to a jumptable entry item. I'm not super-happy with this, but for the moment it seems the least invasive way to do it. A better way might be to go back and allowing nil-items or nil execute-functions to denote "undefined". - [x] benchmarks of eof validation speed --------- Co-authored-by: lightclient <lightclient@protonmail.com> Co-authored-by: Marius van der Wijden <m.vanderwijden@live.de> Co-authored-by: Danno Ferrin <danno.ferrin@shemnon.com>	4 months ago

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

wangjingcun

16f2f7155f

all: typos in comments (#30779 )

fixes some typos

3 months ago

Martin HS

56c4f2bfd4

core/vm, cmd/evm: implement eof validation (#30418 )

The bulk of this PR is authored by @lightclient , in the original
EOF-work. More recently, the code has been picked up and reworked for the new EOF
specification, by @MariusVanDerWijden , in https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pull/29518, and also @shemnon has contributed with fixes.

This PR is an attempt to start eating the elephant one small bite at a
time, by selecting only the eof-validation as a standalone piece which
can be merged without interfering too much in the core stuff.

In this PR: 

- [x] Validation of eof containers, lifted from #29518, along with
test-vectors from consensus-tests and fuzzing, to ensure that the move
did not lose any functionality.
- [x] Definition of eof opcodes, which is a prerequisite for validation
- [x] Addition of `undefined` to a jumptable entry item. I'm not
super-happy with this, but for the moment it seems the least invasive
way to do it. A better way might be to go back and allowing nil-items or
nil execute-functions to denote "undefined".
- [x] benchmarks of eof validation speed 


---------

Co-authored-by: lightclient <lightclient@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Marius van der Wijden <m.vanderwijden@live.de>
Co-authored-by: Danno Ferrin <danno.ferrin@shemnon.com>

4 months ago

2 Commits (2406305175593bb8547f5711912dc41c7a26f0f7)