This change makes the legacy transaction pool use of `uint256.Int` instead of `big.Int`. The changes are made primarily only on the internal functions of legacypool.
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
This change makes use of uin256 to represent balance in state. It touches primarily upon statedb, stateobject and state processing, trying to avoid changes in transaction pools, core types, rpc and tracers.
* core/blobpool: implement txpool for blob txs
* core/txpool: track address reservations to notice any weird bugs
* core/txpool/blobpool: add support for in-memory operation for tests
* core/txpool/blobpool: fix heap updating after SetGasTip if account is evicted
* core/txpool/blobpool: fix eviction order if cheap leading txs are included
* core/txpool/blobpool: add note as to why the eviction fields are not inited in reinject
* go.mod: pull in inmem billy form upstream
* core/txpool/blobpool: fix review commens
* core/txpool/blobpool: make heap and heap test deterministic
* core/txpool/blobpool: luv u linter
* core/txpool: limit blob transactions to 16 per account
* core/txpool/blobpool: fix rebase errors
* core/txpool/blobpool: luv you linter
* go.mod: revert some strange crypto package dep updates
* all: move main transaction pool into a subpool
* go.mod: remove superfluous updates
* core/txpool: review fixes, handle txs rejected by all subpools
* core/txpool: typos
* core/txpool: abstraction prep work for secondary pools (blob pool)
* core/txpool: leave subpool concepts to a followup pr
* les: fix tests using hard coded errors
* core/txpool: use bitmaps instead of maps for tx type filtering
Prior to this change, it was possible that transactions are erroneously deemed as 'future' although they are in fact 'pending', causing them to be dropped due to 'future' not being allowed to replace 'pending'.
This change fixes that, by doing a more in-depth inspection of the queue.
This adds two new rules to the transaction pool:
- A future transaction can not evict a pending transaction.
- A transaction can not overspend available funds of a sender.
---
Co-authored-by: dwn1998 <42262393+dwn1998@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
Ng Wei Han
Martin HS
Péter Szilágyi
rjl493456442
Marius van der Wijden
s7v7nislands