mirror of openzeppelin-contracts
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
 
 
 
 
 
openzeppelin-contracts/docs/modules/ROOT/pages/utilities.adoc

95 lines
5.3 KiB

= Utilities
OpenZeppelin provides a ton of useful utilities that you can use in your project. Here are some of the more popular ones:
[[cryptography]]
== Cryptography
* xref:api:cryptography.adoc#ECDSA[`ECDSA`] — provides functions for recovering and managing Ethereum account ECDSA signatures:
* to use it, declare: `using ECDSA for bytes32;`
* signatures are tightly packed, 65 byte `bytes` that look like `{v (1)} {r (32)} {s (32)}`
** this is the default from `web3.eth.sign` so you probably don't need to worry about this format
* recover the signer using xref:api:cryptography.adoc#ECDSA-recover-bytes32-bytes-[`myDataHash.recover(signature)`]
* if you are using `eth_personalSign`, the signer will hash your data and then add the prefix `\x19Ethereum Signed Message:\n`, so if you're attempting to recover the signer of an Ethereum signed message hash, you'll want to use xref:api:cryptography.adoc#ECDSA-toEthSignedMessageHash-bytes32-[`toEthSignedMessageHash`]
Use these functions in combination to verify that a user has signed some information on-chain:
[source,solidity]
----
keccack256(
abi.encodePacked(
someData,
moreData
)
)
.toEthSignedMessageHash()
.recover(signature)
----
* xref:api:cryptography.adoc#MerkleProof[`MerkleProof`] — provides xref:api:cryptography.adoc#MerkleProof-verify-bytes32---bytes32-bytes32-[`verify`] for verifying merkle proofs.
[[introspection]]
== Introspection
In Solidity, it's frequently helpful to know whether or not a contract supports an interface you'd like to use. ERC165 is a standard that helps do runtime interface detection. OpenZeppelin provides some helpers, both for implementing ERC165 in your contracts and querying other contracts:
* xref:api:introspection.adoc#IERC165[`IERC165`] — this is the ERC165 interface that defines xref:api:introspection.adoc#IERC165-supportsInterface-bytes4-[`supportsInterface`]. When implementing ERC165, you'll conform to this interface.
* xref:api:introspection.adoc#ERC165[`ERC165`] — inherit this contract if you'd like to support interface detection using a lookup table in contract storage. You can register interfaces using xref:api:introspection.adoc#ERC165-_registerInterface-bytes4-[`_registerInterface(bytes4)`]: check out example usage as part of the ERC721 implementation.
* xref:api:introspection.adoc#ERC165Checker[`ERC165Checker`] — ERC165Checker simplifies the process of checking whether or not a contract supports an interface you care about.
* include with `using ERC165Checker for address;`
* xref:api:introspection.adoc#ERC165Checker-_supportsInterface-address-bytes4-[`myAddress._supportsInterface(bytes4)`]
* xref:api:introspection.adoc#ERC165Checker-_supportsAllInterfaces-address-bytes4---[`myAddress._supportsAllInterfaces(bytes4[])`]
[source,solidity]
----
contract MyContract {
using ERC165Checker for address;
bytes4 private InterfaceId_ERC721 = 0x80ac58cd;
/**
* @dev transfer an ERC721 token from this contract to someone else
*/
function transferERC721(
address token,
address to,
uint256 tokenId
)
public
{
require(token.supportsInterface(InterfaceId_ERC721), "IS_NOT_721_TOKEN");
IERC721(token).transferFrom(address(this), to, tokenId);
}
}
----
[[math]]
== Math
The most popular math related library OpenZeppelin provides is xref:api:math.adoc#SafeMath[`SafeMath`], which provides mathematical functions that protect your contract from overflows and underflows.
Include the contract with `using SafeMath for uint256;` and then call the functions:
* `myNumber.add(otherNumber)`
* `myNumber.sub(otherNumber)`
* `myNumber.div(otherNumber)`
* `myNumber.mul(otherNumber)`
* `myNumber.mod(otherNumber)`
Easy!
[[payment]]
== Payment
Want to split some payments between multiple people? Maybe you have an app that sends 30% of art purchases to the original creator and 70% of the profits to the current owner; you can build that with xref:api:payment.adoc#PaymentSplitter[`PaymentSplitter`]!
In solidity, there are some security concerns with blindly sending money to accounts, since it allows them to execute arbitrary code. You can read up on these security concerns in the https://consensys.github.io/smart-contract-best-practices/[Ethereum Smart Contract Best Practices] website. One of the ways to fix reentrancy and stalling problems is, instead of immediately sending Ether to accounts that need it, you can use xref:api:payment.adoc#PullPayment[`PullPayment`], which offers an xref:api:payment.adoc#PullPayment-_asyncTransfer-address-uint256-[`_asyncTransfer`] function for sending money to something and requesting that they xref:api:payment.adoc#PullPayment-withdrawPayments-address-payable-[`withdrawPayments()`] it later.
If you want to Escrow some funds, check out xref:api:payment.adoc#Escrow[`Escrow`] and xref:api:payment.adoc#ConditionalEscrow[`ConditionalEscrow`] for governing the release of some escrowed Ether.
[[misc]]
=== Misc
Want to check if an address is a contract? Use xref:api:utils.adoc#Address[`Address`] and xref:api:utils.adoc#Address-isContract-address-[`Address.isContract()`].
Want to keep track of some numbers that increment by 1 every time you want another one? Check out xref:api:drafts.adoc#Counter[`Counter`]. This is especially useful for creating incremental ERC721 `tokenId`s like we did in the last section.