You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
190 lines
8.9 KiB
190 lines
8.9 KiB
|
|
# Team best practices
|
|
|
|
This document aims to address contributors best practices of the following repositories:
|
|
- Remix Project: https://github.com/ethereum/remix-project
|
|
- Remix Libraries: https://github.com/ethereum/remix-project/tree/master/libs
|
|
|
|
This document is not in its final version, **a team meeting which aim to address new/old best practices, feedback, workflows, all kind of issues related to how the team work together occurs every 2 weeks.**
|
|
This document link to other specialised best practices (like coding best practices).
|
|
|
|
Related links:
|
|
- Public Website: https://remix-project.org
|
|
- Awesome Remix: https://github.com/ethereum/awesome-remix
|
|
- Remix basic FAQ: https://hackmd.io/KVooMJhWRImCGq6zkDgW9A
|
|
- Remix live: https://remix.ethereum.org
|
|
- Remix alpha live: https://remix-alpha.ethereum.org
|
|
- Remix beta live: https://remix-beta.ethereum.org
|
|
- Remix-lib NPM module: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@remix-project/remix-lib
|
|
- Remix-solidity NPM module: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@remix-project/remix-solidity
|
|
- Remix-debug NPM module: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@remix-project/remix-debug
|
|
- Remix-tests NPM module: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@remix-project/remix-tests
|
|
- Remix documentation: http://remix-ide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
|
|
- General gitter channel: https://gitter.im/ethereum/remix
|
|
- Dev gitter channel: https://gitter.im/ethereum/remix-dev
|
|
- Dev plugin gitter channel: https://gitter.im/ethereum/remix-dev-plugin
|
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Team communication
|
|
|
|
### 1) Team meetings:
|
|
|
|
- Daily standup (1pm CET - 11am GMT) for taking care of the current issues.
|
|
|
|
- A regular standup - each Tuesday (3pm CET - 1pm GMT) - which aim to
|
|
- Update every contributor on what others are doing.
|
|
- Update the prioritised issues / PRs list.
|
|
- Address little issues (possibly related to the current ongoing milestone).
|
|
- High level demo, explanation about specific points of the codebase or Ethereum related things.
|
|
|
|
- A milestone standup - scheduled before the beginning of each milestone, roughly on a monthly basis - which aim to define what will be included in the **next milestone** and who will work on what. This standup also help to set a clear long term vision.
|
|
|
|
- A retrospective standup - after each releases - which aim to talk about **best practices in general**: what is good, what is bad, how we can improve workflows.
|
|
|
|
- A tour standup - Just after a release or whenever it is needed - which aim to demo, **explain in details** features, bug fixes or any part of the codebase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 2) Group meetings:
|
|
|
|
- When a story / bug fix is divided in parts, there should be a kickstart meeting with all the developers involved, so that all the devs have a good overview / understanding on:
|
|
- How the story fits into the Ethereum tech.
|
|
- How the backend (if any) works / will work (could be a smart contract).
|
|
- How the frontend works / will work.
|
|
- What is the general vision of the UX design for this particular story.
|
|
Later progress and discussion is updated directly on the issue or pull request (GitHub).
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Prerequisites:
|
|
|
|
Before starting coding, we should ensure all devs / contributors are aware of:
|
|
- Where the codebase is.
|
|
- How to setup and get started (always up to date).
|
|
- How to run tests.
|
|
- Where to find documentation.
|
|
- How to reach us through the communication channels - https://gitter.im/ethereum/remix, https://gitter.im/ethereum/remix-dev.
|
|
- The following best practices:
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Story / Bug fix
|
|
|
|
- Prioritised list of PRs / issues are tracked in a GitHub Project, Remix IDE issues are managed by a prioritized backlog.
|
|
- Every story can be executed by a single developer or a group of 2 or more developers (depending on the size and complexity)
|
|
- Each dev should take the part he/she feels the most comfortable with.
|
|
- Later progress and discussion is updated directly on the issue or pull request (github).
|
|
- When a developer or team decides on the story they want to work on (at the start of milestone for instance), they assign themselves to the issue.
|
|
- Documentation update should be done together with the story, or an issue with the label "documentation" has to be created.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Pull Requests
|
|
|
|
### 1) PR Creator:
|
|
|
|
- It is recommended to use the emoji responses to signal agreement or that you've seen a comment and will address it rather than replying. This reduces github inbox spam.
|
|
- Mark unfinished pull requests with the `Work in Progress` label
|
|
- Large pull requests (above 200-400 lines of code changed) cannot be effectively reviewed and should be split into smaller pieces.
|
|
- Code should comply to the `JavaScript standard style` - https://www.npmjs.com/package/standard
|
|
- You should not expect complete review on a pull request which is not passing CI.
|
|
- You can obviously ask for feedback on your approach.
|
|
- You should assign a reviewer(s).
|
|
- Pull requests should be used as a reference to update coding best practices whenever it is needed.
|
|
|
|
### 2) Review:
|
|
|
|
- Everyone is free to review any pull request.
|
|
- You should add the label "change requested" or "accepted".
|
|
- When reviewing people's code consider the following two comments.
|
|
> I don't like the name of this function.
|
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
> What do you think about changing the name of this function to ....
|
|
|
|
Your feedback will often be better received if you pose it in the form of a question.
|
|
|
|
- Pull request should be reviewed to comply to coding best practices.
|
|
- You should take the responsability of the PR you are reviewing.
|
|
- You should make sure the app is viable after the PR is being merged.
|
|
- You should make sure the PR is correctly tested (e2e tests, unit tests)
|
|
- Ideally You should have enough knowledge to be able to fix related bugs.
|
|
|
|
### 3) Merge:
|
|
|
|
- Merging is possible after Review and Tests are ok and when the PR is approved.
|
|
- After a merge, it is highly recommended to check the new code in `remix-alpha.ethereum.org`
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Milestone
|
|
|
|
- A milestone should **only** contain items we are sure to finish.
|
|
- The end of a milestone triggers a new release.
|
|
- Milestone items and duration should take in account time spent in bugs fixing and support.
|
|
- The team should commit to the milestone duration.
|
|
- If a dev finish early he/she can help other to push remaining tasks.
|
|
- If a dev finish early he/she can work on specifying / integrating the next milestone.
|
|
- A milestone duration is fixed at the start of the milestone (but should better not exceed 1 month).
|
|
- Progress and issues regarding a milestone are discussed on regular standups.
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Milestone - Refinement meeting
|
|
|
|
- A meeting is organized 3 weeks after the beginning of a round. This aims to :
|
|
- list what is left to do.
|
|
- identify any blocker.
|
|
- agree on a release date (which can be earlier 1 week after the meeting and not later than 4 weeks after the meeting.
|
|
- add issues that are eligible to get in the release.
|
|
- remove issues that aren't doable in time or represent a risk.
|
|
- plan for asking feedback about new features (in social medias).
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Releases
|
|
|
|
### 1) Process:
|
|
- Should be documented and updated.
|
|
- A new release is triggered:
|
|
- after an important bug fix
|
|
- at the end of a milestone
|
|
- We can release an `m.m.m-alpha.x` (whenever we need to release and for whatever reasons) being in between a feature / bug fix completion.
|
|
- We release an `m.m.x` whenever there is a bug fix.
|
|
- We release an `m.x.0` whenever there is a new feature.
|
|
- We release an `x.0.0` after each milestone we consider being an important progress.
|
|
- We release an `x.0.0` if there's an API breaking change in one of our libraries.
|
|
- After a new release we should stay in alert for possible regression and better not release Friday at 5pm :)
|
|
|
|
### 2) Community:
|
|
- Before the official release, we should select a group of power users and invite them to test and give feedbacks.
|
|
- Users need to know upfront a new release is coming and we should prepare them for it by showcasing some new features they can expect and when it will happen (fixed date, published at least 1 week in advance).
|
|
- Whenever we have a new release we have to communicate this efficiently (twitter, reddit, ...).
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 1) Bugs:
|
|
- A critical bug should get the label `Blocker`, and every effort should be put to fix it.
|
|
- Addressing a non critical and non planned bug can be done:
|
|
- After having notified in the `remix-dev` channel if the bug does not involve UX or public API changes.
|
|
- After a dev meeting (e.g the regular standup) if the bug involves any UX or public API changes.
|
|
|
|
### 2) Support:
|
|
|
|
- We should all keep an eye on the public non dev channel and file user feedback.
|
|
|
|
### 3) Documentation:
|
|
|
|
- The documentation is done / updated just after the feature / release in a team effort.
|
|
- Documentation work is filable as a github issue.
|
|
- It is encouraged to find and link associated doc produced by the community (blog posts, videos, tutorials, ...)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Coding best practices
|
|
|
|
- https://github.com/ethereum/remix-project/blob/master/best-practices.md
|
|
|